Freakonomics' Stephen Dubner argues the NYT has evolved from a paper that presented new information into one that curates a few key topics daily and prescribes a specific viewpoint on them, a change he finds less valuable as a reader.
Even though anyone can create media, legacy brands like The New York Times retain immense power. Their established brands are perceived by the public as more authoritative and trustworthy, giving them a 'monopoly on truth' that new creators lack.
Contrary to the belief that costly journalism is subsidized by lifestyle products, the NYT CEO asserts that hardcore news is the most economically value-creating part of the business because it generates a massive audience and brand authority.
The primary challenge for journalism today isn't its own decline, but the audience's evolution. People now consume media from many sources, often knowingly biased ones, piecing together their own version of reality. They've shifted from being passive information recipients to active curators of their own truth.
Adam Carolla suggests that as newsrooms became majority-female, their culture shifted. He argues women are more emotionally inclined to "pick a side," leading to advocacy journalism instead of neutral reporting, much like a mother struggling to be an impartial umpire for her own son's game.
In a polarized media environment, audiences increasingly judge news as biased if it doesn't reflect their own opinions. This creates a fundamental challenge for public media outlets aiming for objectivity, as their down-the-middle approach can be cast as politically hostile by partisans who expect their views to be validated.
The primary consumption of news has shifted from destination sites to algorithmically curated social feeds. Platforms like Threads and X have become superior curators of content from legacy sources, personalizing discovery so effectively that users now rely on them to surface relevant articles, bypassing the publisher's own homepage.
Stephen Dubner realized at the NYT that traditional media already prospered by carving out specific audiences and feeding them aligned content. Social media is not a new phenomenon in this regard; it is merely a technological acceleration of a pre-existing, market-driven journalism model.
The century-long journalistic tradition of impartial, 'scientific' fact-gathering was allegedly dismantled by the baby boomer generation. Finding dry reporting dull, they championed an activist, narrative-driven style—seen in underground press coverage of Vietnam—which has since become the mainstream media's dominant mode.
Despite declining viewership, legacy media institutions like The New York Times and Washington Post remain critical because they produce the raw content and shape the narratives that fuel the entire digital ecosystem. They provide the 'coal' that other platforms burn for engagement, giving them unrecognized leverage.
The promise of new media was to foster deep, nuanced conversations that legacy outlets abandoned. However, it is increasingly falling into the same traps: becoming predictable, obsessed with personality feuds, and chasing clicks with inflammatory content instead of pursuing truth.