This theory posits that our lives don't *create* subjective experiences (qualia). Instead, our lives are the emergent result of a fundamental consciousness cycling through a sequence of possible qualia, dictated by probabilistic, Markovian rules.

Our experience of consciousness is itself a model created by the mind. It's a simulation of what it would be like for an observer to exist, have a perspective, and reflect on its own state. This makes consciousness a computational, not a magical, phenomenon.

In a reality where spacetime is not fundamental, physical objects like neurons are merely "rendered" upon observation. Therefore, neurons cannot be the fundamental creator of consciousness because they don't exist independently until an observer interacts with them.

Cognitive neuroscientist Donald Hoffman argues neurons don't exist unperceived and don't cause behavior. They are a "headset" or user interface representing a deeper reality. Studying them is crucial, but only to reverse-engineer the software running the simulation, not to find the source of consciousness.

The question of how consciousness emerges from physical systems like AI is flawed. Hoffman argues consciousness is fundamental. A physical object, be it a brain or silicon chip, is merely a limited "headset" representation of an underlying conscious reality. Consciousness doesn't emerge from matter; matter is a symbol for consciousness.

The "filter thesis" suggests the brain doesn't generate consciousness but acts as a reducing valve for a broader reality. This explains why psychedelics, trauma, or near-death experiences—states of disrupted brain activity—can lead to heightened consciousness. The filter is weakened, allowing more of reality to pour in.

When we observe neurons, we are not seeing the true substrate of thought. Instead, we are seeing our 'headset's' symbolic representation of the complex conscious agent dynamics that are responsible for creating our interface in the first place.

If our reality is a perceptual "headset," then understanding the underlying consciousness that projects it is like learning a video game's source code. This knowledge could unlock the ability to alter the rules of our perceived world, creating technologies indistinguishable from magic.

Extending the simulation theory, cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that your physical components, like neurons, do not exist persistently. They are rendered into existence only in the moment of perception by an observer. If a neuroscientist observes your brain, the neurons exist in their perception, but they were never 'your' neurons in an objective, independent sense.