Paradoxically, tariffs intended to punish China could result in it facing lower duty rates than US allies like Japan or South Korea. This is because China possesses unique retaliatory leverage (e.g., rare earths) to force targeted tariff reductions from the U.S., an option unavailable to other nations.

Despite a Supreme Court ruling against the president's broad reciprocal tariffs, the administration is expected to re-impose them using more targeted, sector-specific legal authorities. This means economic relief from lower tariffs will be short-lived, as the underlying protectionist policy stance remains.

The Supreme Court's ruling requires refunding over $100 billion in illegally collected tariffs to companies. If processed quickly, this massive cash injection into the economy could act as a pre-midterm stimulus, ironically providing a potential political benefit to the Trump administration despite its legal defeat.

Despite the Supreme Court striking down his tariff authority under one law, Trump will likely find a new legal justification to continue imposing them. The economic leverage tariffs provide for international negotiations is too valuable for his administration to relinquish, signaling a potential constitutional conflict.

Even if the Supreme Court rules against the administration, it may not change U.S. tariff levels. The executive branch has alternative legal authorities, like Section 301, that it can use to maintain the same tariffs, making a court defeat less of a market-moving event than it appears.

The success of tariffs hinges on the insight that China's economic model prioritizes volume and employment over per-unit profitability. This creates a vulnerability where Chinese producers are forced to absorb tariff costs to maintain output, effectively subsidizing the tariff revenue and preventing significant price increases for US consumers.

While the base case is that the President would replace tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court, there's a growing possibility he won't. The administration could use the ruling as a politically convenient way to reduce tariffs and address voter concerns about affordability without appearing to back down on trade policy.

If tariffs are reduced following a court ruling, companies will experience immediate cost relief. However, these savings are passed to consumers slowly, over two to three quarters. This delay creates a temporary tailwind for corporate profit margins before prices on the shelf fall.

Despite US tariffs, China’s trade surplus reached a record high. This is because China diversified exports to emerging markets, utilized transshipment through other countries, and key allies have not joined the US in a broad trade war.