Historically, economic downturns accelerate technological displacement. During a recession, companies lay off workers and then use the subsequent recovery to evaluate how many roles can be permanently replaced by new technology like AI. The next recession could therefore trigger a significant wave of structural unemployment.
A bewildering disconnect exists between high market enthusiasm and extreme geopolitical and economic uncertainty. This suggests investors are either willfully ignorant of the risks or believe they are insulated, creating a fragile environment where a materialized risk could trigger a sudden, severe, and nonlinear market crash.
A major disconnect exists in housing policy. Experts agree the root cause of unaffordability is a supply shortage, but voters focus on interest rates and investors. Politicians thus champion demand-side fixes and investor bans that are politically popular but have only a marginal impact on the structural problem.
Unlike typical economic cycles with a clear baseline and tail risks, the current environment is defined by radical uncertainty. The combined unknowns of erratic economic policy and AI's transformative potential create a "flat distribution" where extreme outcomes like a depression or an industrial revolution are nearly as likely as a baseline scenario.
Despite a Supreme Court ruling against the president's broad reciprocal tariffs, the administration is expected to re-impose them using more targeted, sector-specific legal authorities. This means economic relief from lower tariffs will be short-lived, as the underlying protectionist policy stance remains.
Artificial intelligence offers immense promise but currently poses significant risks. It's driving a potential financial bubble in tech stocks, and the resulting wealth effect is powering consumer spending, especially at the high end. This creates a precarious situation where a market correction could have major macroeconomic impacts.
The core of the housing affordability crisis is a structural lack of supply for entry-level homes and workforce rentals. Even with ideal policy interventions today, the time required for development means meaningful relief is at least 18-24 months away. There are no quick fixes that can address this underlying problem.
While headline GDP figures seem positive, the US economy shows signs of weakness. Growth is driven by high-income households drawing down savings, while the job market is stagnant outside of the healthcare sector. This creates a "K-shaped" dynamic where macro numbers obscure underlying fragility.