Chinese companies excel at manufacturing but lack the decades-long brand legacy of Western counterparts. By acquiring names like Sony's TV division, they instantly gain consumer trust and heritage, a "buy vs. build" strategy specifically for brand equity.

Related Insights

A major cultural shift has occurred in China. Consumers have moved from coveting foreign brands like Starbucks and Apple as status symbols to proudly supporting domestic champions. This is driven by both national pride in local innovation and better value.

Instead of building a consumer brand from scratch, a technologically innovative but unknown company can license its core tech to an established player. This go-to-market strategy leverages the partner's brand equity and distribution to reach customers faster and validate the technology without massive marketing spend.

Just as P&G wouldn't rename a popular soap, acquirers shouldn't change a successful B2B product's name. The brand holds immense equity built over years. Changing BlueKai to an Oracle brand name, for instance, instantly erases value that persists in the market's mind for over a decade.

While Apple, valued in the trillions, abandoned its car project after a decade, Chinese electronics firm Xiaomi, worth a fraction as much, launched a record-beating electric vehicle in three years. This highlights the execution-focused, vertically integrated model that allows Chinese companies to out-maneuver wealthier but less agile Western competitors.

Qualcomm's entry into the Interbrand 100 was 70% driven by turning its Snapdragon ingredient brand into a household name. This demonstrates that a B2B tech company can significantly boost its corporate brand value by investing in a consumer-facing sub-brand, even if that sub-brand's financials are not reported separately.

The global expansion playbook is reversing. Chinese brands like Luckin Coffee, having perfected low-cost, tech-integrated models in a hyper-competitive home market, are now expanding into the West. They are attempting a "reverse Starbucks," bringing their operational efficiency and aggressive pricing to markets like New York.

Instead of justifying brand building as a defense against AI-driven commoditization, frame it as an offensive move that builds long-term value. A strong brand shortens sales cycles and increases customer lifetime value, directly impacting revenue and making it a proactive investment that resonates with CEOs and CFOs.

Facing hyper-competitive local rivals, Starbucks is selling a majority stake in its China business. This is not a retreat, but a strategic shift to a joint venture model. It's a playbook for Western brands to gain local agility, faster product rollouts, and deeper digital integration where Western brand dominance is fading.

The value of an asset like CBS isn't its current content but its decades-old brand recognition and trust. This brand equity is a moat that cannot be built overnight, regardless of funding. Even a $50 billion fundraise couldn't instantly create a competitor with the same perceived authority and history.

Instead of building brands from scratch, Chinese manufacturing giants are acquiring struggling but historically significant Western companies. This strategy allows them to instantly inherit brand legacy, consumer trust, and market access that would otherwise take decades to develop.