The Fed is abandoning its 15-year strategy of using detailed "forward guidance" to suppress market volatility. This shift under new leadership towards more succinct communication suggests a new market regime characterized by higher interest rate volatility and less Fed hand-holding.

The new Fed Chair's plan to reduce "forward guidance" removes a source of market certainty. Without explicit signaling about future policy, every new economic data point will have a greater potential to shift market sentiment, leading to higher volatility even if the Fed takes no action on rates.

The push to limit forward guidance, reduce press conferences, and silence dissenting Fed presidents is not just about improving clarity. It's a strategic move to centralize messaging and control the narrative within the Fed Chair's office, thereby increasing their personal influence over policy direction and market expectations.

Kevin Warsh's confirmation hearings suggest a potential regime change at the Fed. He has indicated possible shifts in how inflation is measured (using trimmed mean), the size of the balance sheet, and a reduction in market communication like forward guidance.

The recent Fed meeting showed the most dissents in over 30 years, not on rates but on forward guidance language. This internal division, preceding a new chair, suggests the era of clear, consensus-driven central bank messaging is over, heralding more volatility.

Constant forward guidance and dot plots lock the Fed into predetermined paths. This prevented a timely end to QE in 2021 despite rising inflation, as they were constrained by their own communication protocols. Less communication would allow for more agility.

Fears of a less transparent Fed may be overstated. The most probable change to communication is removing the official median projection from the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP). This is a minor tweak, not a withdrawal of forward guidance, as markets would calculate the median anyway.

New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has signaled a desire to reduce transparency by potentially ending press conferences. This would be a major reversal of a multi-decade trend towards more openness. Since current traders have only known a highly transparent Fed, such a change could introduce significant uncertainty and volatility into markets.

Warsh believes the Fed relies too heavily on forward guidance, particularly the 'dot plot,' which he feels boxes in members. He will likely downgrade or eliminate it and encourage Fed presidents to speak less publicly, aiming for more agile and less predetermined monetary policy decisions.