The 'never give up' mantra is misleading. Successful founders readily abandon failed products and even entire startups. Their unwavering persistence is not tied to a specific idea, but to the meta-goal of finding product-market fit itself, no matter how many attempts it takes.

Related Insights

The idea that startups find product-market fit and then simply scale is a myth. Great companies like Microsoft and Google continuously evolve and reinvent themselves. Lasting success requires ongoing adaptation, not resting on an initial achievement.

Founders often create complex plans and documents to avoid the simple, hard, and uncomfortable task of selling. Just as getting stronger requires consistently lifting heavier weights, finding product-market fit requires consistently doing the core work of talking to customers and trying to sell.

When a startup finally uncovers true customer demand, their existing product, built on assumptions, is often the wrong shape. The most common pattern is for these startups to burn down their initial codebase and rebuild from scratch to perfectly fit the newly discovered demand.

Founders must distinguish between persistence and fighting a losing battle. If you constantly feel like you're pushing a boulder uphill to convince the market, you're on the wrong path. Genuine product-market fit feels like the market is pulling you, and your job is to sprint to keep up.

Many founders become too attached to what they've built. The ability to unemotionally kill products that aren't working—even core parts of the business—is a superpower. This prevents wasting resources and allows for the rapid pivots necessary to find true product-market fit.

Success in startups requires nuanced thinking, not absolute rules. For instance, product-market fit isn't a simple 'yes' or 'no' checkbox; it exists on a spectrum. Learning to see these shades of gray in funding, marketing, and product strategy is a hallmark of a mature founder.