Deciding to pivot isn't about perseverance; it's a cold, rational decision made when you've exhausted all non-ridiculous ideas for success. The main barrier is emotional—it's "fucking humiliating" to admit you were wrong. The key is to separate the intellectual decision from the emotional cost.

In 2008, Howard Marks invested billions with conviction while markets crashed, yet he wasn't certain of the outcome. He held the paradox of needing to act decisively against the crowd while simultaneously accepting the real possibility of being wrong. This mental balance is crucial for high-stakes decisions.

Our brains are wired to find evidence that supports our existing beliefs. To counteract this dangerous bias in investing, actively search for dissenting opinions and information that challenge your thesis. A crucial question to ask is, 'What would need to happen for me to be wrong about this investment?'

Absolute truths are rare in complex systems like markets. A more pragmatic approach is to find guiding principles—like "buy assets for less than they're worth"—that are generally effective over the long term, even if they underperform in specific periods. This framework balances conviction with flexibility.

Howard Marks highlights a critical paradox for investors and forecasters: a correct prediction that materializes too late is functionally the same as an incorrect one. This implies that timing is as crucial as the thesis itself, requiring a willingness to look wrong in the short term.

According to Ken Griffin, legendary investors aren't just right more often. Their key trait is having deep clarity on their specific competitive advantage and the conviction to bet heavily on it. Equally important is the discipline to unemotionally cut losses when wrong and simply move on.

To combat endowment effect and status quo bias, legendary trader Paul Tudor Jones advises viewing every position as if you were deciding to put it on today. This creates a zero-based mindset, forcing you to justify each holding's continued place in your portfolio.

McCullough advocates for a "promiscuous" investment strategy, quickly moving capital to where signals are strongest. He argues that emotional attachment to winning positions, or "bag holding," is the primary way investors lose ground. The goal is to compound returns by avoiding drawdowns, not by marrying a single investment thesis.

While having a disciplined rule like reviewing a stock after 24 months is useful, it should be subordinate to a more critical rule: sell immediately if the fundamental investment thesis breaks. This flexibility prevents holding onto a losing position simply to adhere to a predefined timeline.