We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When an AI suggests a bad-fit account, don't just discard it. The speaker dictates the reason for the error back to the AI and explicitly instructs it to update its permanent "outbound process" document. This trains the AI's core logic to avoid similar mistakes in the future, creating a smarter system over time.
AI models don't learn from feedback like humans; they repeat errors confidently. To combat this, build your personal AI system around a 'postmortem log' that records every mistake and correction. This forces the AI to learn and prevents you from becoming a repetitive editor.
Don't just regenerate content you dislike. Provide specific feedback and then explicitly command the AI to "update the skill" with this new information. This creates a system that learns and improves from every interaction, moving beyond generating generic "lazy slop."
When an AI tool makes a mistake, treat it as a learning opportunity for the system. Ask the AI to reflect on why it failed, such as a flaw in its system prompt or tooling. Then, update the underlying documentation and prompts to prevent that specific class of error from happening again in the future.
To prevent recurring errors, Lieberman's AI system maintains a "Content Lessons" markdown file. When he gives feedback on a draft, the system abstracts the changes into reusable lessons and logs them. The AI then consults this file for all future drafts, creating a powerful reinforcement loop that improves quality over time.
When a large language model provides a poor response, a highly effective technique is to treat it like a new employee. Instead of just re-prompting, ask it to explain its reasoning ("Why is that?") to understand the error, then provide clear, corrective feedback.
Instead of complex prompts, interact with AI agents as you would a human employee. When the agent makes a mistake (like a broken link), provide simple, conversational feedback. The agent can then understand the error and self-correct its process for future tasks.
When a prompt yields poor results, use a meta-prompting technique. Feed the failing prompt back to the AI, describe the incorrect output, specify the desired outcome, and explicitly grant it permission to rewrite, add, or delete. The AI will then debug and improve its own instructions.
The most critical step is the last one. After a prospecting session, the speaker instructs the AI to review their entire chat, identify any mistakes or inefficiencies, and then rewrite its own core process documents. This self-correction ensures the system becomes smarter and more efficient with every use.
When an AI model makes the same undesirable output two or three times, treat it as a signal. Create a custom rule or prompt instruction that explicitly codifies the desired behavior. This trains the AI to avoid that specific mistake in the future, improving consistency over time.
When reviewing work, an AI-native leader's role shifts. Instead of repeatedly giving the same feedback (e.g., "put the CTA above the fold"), they should fix the underlying AI skill, prompt, or design system that caused the error, thus automating the correction for all future work.