Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Many professionals run their calendars on a 'first in time, first in right' basis, similar to outdated water rights for the Colorado River. Recurring meetings, scheduled years ago, continue to claim valuable time slots, even if they are no longer the most efficient or equitable use of that time. This reveals a hidden, inefficient market in our own schedules.

Related Insights

The feeling of being over-scheduled is a symptom of running ineffective meetings with no clear purpose. These bad meetings create new problems that then spawn more meetings to fix them, creating a vicious cycle of wasted time. The solution is better meetings, not fewer.

Scheduled, recurring meetings can lead to teams inventing topics to discuss simply because the time is blocked. This creates busywork that isn't impactful. It's better to meet when necessary rather than defaulting to a fixed cadence without a clear, persistent need.

Before scheduling, ensure a meeting's purpose is to Decide, Debate, Discuss, or Develop (4Ds). Then, confirm the topic is either Complex, Emotionally intense, or a One-way door decision (CEO). This rigorous filter eliminates status updates and other low-value synchronous gatherings from calendars.

If a recurring meeting serves multiple purposes (e.g., status, strategy, and tactical), it's a "Frankenstein" meeting that should be eliminated. Audit your meetings, assign a single label (Tactical, Strategic, or Operational) to each, and split any meeting that has multiple labels into separate, focused sessions.

You are the designer of the 'hidden markets' for your personal resources like time and attention. Instead of reacting haphazardly, you can consciously set rules that optimize for efficiency (highest impact), equity (fairness), and ease (simplicity), thereby taking active control of your personal productivity and focus.

Calendly's research reveals a paradox: while the common sentiment is anti-meeting, a vast majority (81%) of professionals believe more productive meetings would help them at work. This suggests the problem isn't the quantity of meetings, but their quality and purpose. People crave effective, decision-oriented collaboration.

Dysfunctional meetings are often a symptom, not the root problem. When clear communication channels are lacking, employees default to meetings because they are highly visible, creating a performance of productivity, and they effectively hijack others' attention, making them a blunt tool for getting noticed.

Instead of incrementally auditing meetings, a "meeting doomsday" involves deleting all recurring meetings for 48 hours. This forces teams to consciously rebuild their calendars from scratch, questioning the necessity, cadence, and attendees for every meeting, which is more effective than defending existing ones.

Eliminate 'meeting debt' by deleting all recurring meetings from calendars. This forces a deliberate rebuild, leveraging the IKEA effect (we value what we build ourselves) and jolting people out of autopilot. This radical reset helps teams reclaim significant time and redesign their collaboration intentionally.

The Zeigarnik effect causes the brain to fixate on open loops, like a future meeting. For a maker, this scheduled task consumes mental bandwidth, disrupts immersion, and forces clock-watching, killing productivity hours before the meeting even begins. The cost is far greater than the meeting's duration.