For SaaS acquisitions over $2M, acquirers prioritize growth above all else. Taking profits means you're not reinvesting that cash into growth, which could ultimately reduce your ARR multiple and overall exit value. Profitability is seen as a deliberate choice to grow slower.
Outbound Sync founder Harris Kenney consciously delays building internal tools like integrated billing, even approaching $500k ARR. He prioritizes sacrificing operational efficiency 'on the altar of MRR growth,' demonstrating that manual processes are acceptable as long as the core growth engine is firing.
A significant shift has occurred: private equity firms are no longer actively pursuing acquisitions of solid SaaS companies that fall short of IPO scale. This disappearance of a reliable exit path forces VCs and founders to find new strategies for liquidity and growth.
Beluga Labs adopted a small business mindset from day one, ensuring they were profitable on their very first customer. This financial discipline, counter to the "growth at all costs" mentality, keeps margins high and reduces reliance on continuous VC funding, giving the founders more control and a sustainable path forward.
The goal of a customer-financed acquisition model isn't just profitability. It's to make customer acquisition so efficient that it ceases to be a constraint, shifting the primary business challenge to scaling service delivery and operations—a much better problem to have.
Effective businesses base their acquisition spending on the total expected lifetime profit from a customer (the "back end"), not the profit from the initial sale. This allows for more aggressive and sustainable growth by reinvesting future earnings into current acquisition efforts.
For years, founders of profitable but slow-growing SaaS companies could rely on a private equity acquisition as a viable exit. That safety net is gone. PE firms are now just as wary of AI disruption and growth decay as VCs, leaving many 'pretty good' SaaS companies with no buyers.
The industry glorifies aggressive revenue growth, but scaling an unprofitable model is a trap. If a business isn't profitable at $1 million, it will only amplify its losses at $5 million. Sustainable growth requires a strong financial foundation and a focus on the bottom line, not just the top.
The macroeconomic shift to a high-margin, high-interest-rate environment means SaaS companies must abandon the 'growth at all costs' playbook. Pricing decisions, such as usage-based models that delay revenue, have critical cash flow implications. Strategy must now favor profitability and immediate cash generation.
Many founders believe growing top-line revenue will solve their bottom-line profit issues. However, if the underlying business model is unprofitable, scaling revenue simply scales the losses. The focus should be on fixing profitability at the current size before pursuing growth.
High SaaS revenue multiples make buyouts too expensive for management teams. This contrasts with traditional businesses valued on lower EBITDA multiples, where buyouts are more common. The exception is for stable, low-growth SaaS companies where a deal might be structured with seller financing.