While AI can attempt complex, hour-long tasks with 50% success, its reliability plummets for longer operations. For mission-critical enterprise use requiring 99.9% success, current AI can only reliably complete tasks taking about three seconds. This necessitates breaking large problems into many small, reliable micro-tasks.

The primary obstacle for tools like OpenAI's Atlas isn't technical capability but the user's workload. The time, effort, and security risk required to verify an AI agent's autonomous actions often exceed the time it would take for a human to perform the task themselves, limiting practical use cases.

The problem with AI agents isn't getting them to work; it's managing their success. Once deployed, they operate 24/7, generating a high volume of responses and meetings. Your biggest challenge will shift from outreach capacity to your human team's ability to keep up with the AI's constant activity and output.

AI is not a 'set and forget' solution. An agent's effectiveness directly correlates with the amount of time humans invest in training, iteration, and providing fresh context. Performance will ebb and flow with human oversight, with the best results coming from consistent, hands-on management.

Despite access to state-of-the-art models, most ChatGPT users defaulted to older versions. The cognitive load of using a "model picker" and uncertainty about speed/quality trade-offs were bigger barriers than price. Automating this choice is key to driving mass adoption of advanced AI reasoning.

Despite marketing hype, current AI agents are not fully autonomous and cannot replace an entire human job. They excel at executing a sequence of defined tasks to achieve a specific goal, like research, but lack the complex reasoning for broader job functions. True job replacement is likely still years away.

While seemingly logical, hard budget caps on AI usage are ineffective because they can shut down an agent mid-task, breaking workflows and corrupting data. The superior approach is "governed consumption" through infrastructure, which allows for rate limits and monitoring without compromising the agent's core function.

AI struggles with tasks requiring long and wide context, like software engineering. Because adding a linear amount of context requires an exponential increase in compute power, it cannot effectively manage the complex interdependencies of large projects.

Contrary to the trend toward multi-agent systems, Tasklet finds that one powerful agent with access to all context and tools is superior for a single user's goals. Splitting tasks among specialized agents is less effective than giving one generalist agent all information, as foundation models are already experts at everything.