Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Investors mistakenly view trend following solely as a defensive 'crisis alpha' tool. Its primary benefit is actually offensive: providing dynamic exposure to the significant upside trends (the 'right tail') in asset classes most portfolios lack, like commodities, currencies, and foreign bonds.

Related Insights

A basic trend-following system for gold—buying only when it reaches a new all-time high and selling after a modest pullback—historically outperforms a passive buy-and-hold approach. This counterintuitive finding suggests that for certain volatile assets, systematic momentum strategies can be more effective than passive ownership, capturing upside while managing downside risk.

The term "trend following" misrepresents how managed futures generate alpha. Their value lies in identifying and taking early, contrarian positions on major macroeconomic shifts—like rising rates or currency devaluations—before they become consensus, allowing them to profit when the world changes significantly.

A portfolio's performance can be dramatically enhanced by combining traditionally separate strategies. A leveraged mix of equities (S&P), hedges (long volatility), and trend-following strategies can produce returns that are multiples higher (e.g., 40x) than equities alone (e.g., 6-7x) over the same period.

The most profitable periods for trend following occur when market trends extend far beyond what seems rational or fundamentally justified. The strategy is designed to stay disciplined as prices move to levels few can imagine, long after others have exited.

Many trend followers only trade stock market indices, which dilutes performance by averaging all constituents. Trading individual stocks provides far greater potential for capturing extreme outlier moves, both long and short. An index, by definition, mutes the very trends the strategy seeks to exploit.

The investment industry often forces trend followers (CTAs) into the narrow role of 'crisis alpha' for stock-heavy portfolios. By optimizing to protect against equity crashes, these managers dilute their core strategy and sacrifice overall long-term performance, a situation Jerry Parker calls 'Stockholm syndrome.'

“Crisis Alpha” is not a guaranteed hedge but the result of a managed futures strategy successfully capturing extreme macroeconomic shifts. The strategy is fundamentally about following major macro themes, with a crisis simply being one of the most intense themes it can follow.

Beyond its primary role of reducing drawdowns, trend following acts as a premier diversifier that can solve several portfolio construction flaws at once. It can dynamically allocate to foreign markets (solving home bias), value stocks (when they're trending), and real assets like gold and silver, providing exposure that traditional portfolios often neglect.

Investors hesitant to buy assets like gold near all-time highs can use trend following for exposure. The strategy systematically enters prevailing trends and, crucially, provides a built-in, non-emotional exit signal when the trend reverses, mitigating timing risk.

Many investors equate managed futures with trend following. However, managed futures is a broad industry category that also includes mean reversion, carry, and other strategies. Pure trend following is a specific subset focused solely on capturing large, outlier moves with a low win-rate.