The race between OpenAI and Anthropic to go public involves a strategic trade-off. Going first captures market buzz and initial investor excitement. However, a poor stock performance could chill the entire market for subsequent AI IPOs, creating a dilemma: seize the hype or let a rival test the waters first.
Scott Galloway argues that OpenAI's highly anticipated IPO is unlikely to happen. The company's momentum has turned negative, major partnerships are fraying, and its high private valuation creates a 'veto block' from late-stage investors unwilling to accept a lower public price.
The first AI lab to IPO gains a significant strategic advantage. A successful IPO could absorb available investor capital and momentum, making a competitor's subsequent offering more difficult. Conversely, a failed IPO could pop the "AI bubble" and close the window for everyone, making timing a high-stakes gamble.
Anthropic's rumored plan to go public before OpenAI is a strategic threat. If Anthropic IPOs first with a clearer path to profitability, it could absorb significant investor demand for AI stocks, putting OpenAI in a weaker position and forcing it to accelerate its own, less-prepared public debut.
OpenAI, the initial leader in generative AI, is now on the defensive as competitors like Google and Anthropic copy and improve upon its core features. This race demonstrates that being first offers no lasting moat; in fact, it provides a roadmap for followers to surpass the leader, creating a first-mover disadvantage.
As OpenAI and Anthropic gear up to go public, the pressure to generate profit is mounting. This shift from pure research to building ad-driven, commercial products creates a culture clash, causing disillusioned engineers who joined for loftier goals to quit.
With companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic potentially going public, the fight for coveted, brand-aligned ticker symbols like "MARS" or "GPT" will become a significant subplot. The first company to file will snag these valuable branding assets, creating strategic urgency and a public "outburst" around the IPO.
Despite its early dominance, OpenAI's internal "Code Red" in response to competitors like Google's Gemini and Anthropic demonstrates a critical business lesson. An early market lead is not a guarantee of long-term success, especially in a rapidly evolving field like artificial intelligence.
A potential merger between xAI and the IPO-ready SpaceX would allow Elon Musk to take an AI company public far ahead of rivals OpenAI and Anthropic. This move serves as an "end run" around the traditional process, aiming to capture the first-mover advantage and the narrative as the primary public AI investment.
With multiple giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX eyeing public offerings, there's a real concern that the market cannot absorb them all simultaneously. This creates a bottleneck, forcing companies to carefully time their IPOs to avoid cannibalizing investor demand and potentially devaluing their listings.
While OpenAI is actively preparing for a potential IPO as soon as Q4, its massive $100B+ funding round provides a significant cash runway. This gives the company the flexibility to delay its public offering until 2027 if market conditions aren't optimal, allowing it to time its debut for maximum impact.