While large pharmaceutical companies are filled with a wide breadth of smart people, smaller biotech firms offer a different kind of intellectual environment. They feature the same degree of brilliance, but it's concentrated in a much more focused organization, creating a unique depth of talent.
Related Insights
BridgeBio's unique structure creates dedicated subsidiaries for each program. This empowers small, focused teams closest to the science to make key decisions—"play calling on the field"—without layers of bureaucracy. This model dramatically accelerates development, leading to unprecedented output of new drugs.
Dr. Vibha Jawa's career shows a powerful strategy: learning drug development fundamentals in large companies (Amgen, Merck) and applying them in nimble startups. This cycle across different environments accelerates learning and deepens expertise in a specialized field like immunogenicity.
The transition from a leadership role at a large pharma company like Gilead to a biotech CEO involves a massive shift in scope. Instead of managing one large function with a large team, a biotech CEO is hands-on with every aspect of the company, from science to finance.
In the rare disease space, success hinges on deep patient community engagement. Smaller, nimbler biotechs often excel at creating these essential personal ties, giving them a significant advantage over larger pharmaceutical companies.
The transition from a resource-rich environment like Novartis to an early-stage biotech reveals a stark contrast. The unlimited access to a global organization is replaced by a total reliance on a small, nimble team where everyone must be multi-skilled and hands-on, a change even experienced executives find jarring.
Resolution Therapeutics' CEO builds his team with leaders from varied backgrounds across different diseases and drug modalities. He believes this diversity creates more robust problem-solving, as challenges that are novel in one area may have been solved in another, enabling faster and more informed decisions.
In crowded fields like oncology, most companies flock to a few validated ideas, like kids chasing a soccer ball. Delpha Therapeutics' CEO Kevin Marks argues the real opportunity lies in pioneering novel biology in the wide-open parts of the field, creating a strategic advantage and potential scarcity effect.
Beyond a supportive ecosystem, CDR Life's CEO highlights Switzerland's dense concentration of well-trained life science professionals from big pharma, biotech, and top universities as its most critical advantage. This makes it easier to hire and retain the specialized talent essential for a biotech's success.
To avoid the pitfalls of scale in R&D, Eli Lilly operates small, focused labs of 300-400 people. These 'internal biotechs' have mission focus and autonomy, while leveraging the parent company's scale for clinical trials and distribution.
Former Biogen R&D head Al Sandrock defines the agility of a small company not just as speed, but as the ability to make decisions by informally gathering key people in the hallway, bypassing the need to schedule formal meetings. This contrasts with large organizations where many more people and committees are necessarily involved.
