Instead of competing directly with an established drug, companies can target a non-overlapping, genetically defined patient population. Idea Biosciences' drug for uveal melanoma is for HLA A2-negative patients, while the approved drug KimTrac is for HLA A2-positive patients. This strategy allows for market entry without a head-to-head battle.

Related Insights

Causeway Therapeutics strategically targets a market with no existing FDA-approved drugs. By focusing on conditions like tennis elbow, where the standard of care is limited, they are creating a new therapeutic category rather than competing in a crowded space, giving them a unique market position.

When asked about risks, Apogee's CEO identified a lack of focus—not clinical failure—as the primary threat. By concentrating resources on atopic dermatitis, a large but underserved market, the smaller company can execute faster and more effectively than larger, more diffuse competitors like Sanofi and Lilly.

In the competitive oncology market, Step Pharma differentiates itself by highlighting its novel, "first-in-class" mechanism and excellent safety profile. This strategy attracts interest by focusing on a unique therapeutic opportunity and potential for combination therapies, rather than competing directly on incremental efficacy gains.

To maintain a competitive edge, BridgeBio only pursues programs that are either "first in class" (a novel treatment where none exists) or "best in class" (a demonstrably superior option, like an oral pill versus a daily injection). This strict strategic filter is the core of their entire R&D pipeline selection process.

Luba Greenwood reframes competition in biotech as a positive force. When multiple companies pursue the same biological target, it validates the target's importance and accelerates discovery. This collaborative mindset benefits the entire field and, ultimately, patients, as the best and safest drug will prevail.

Even though companies like Moderna (mRNA) and Transgene (viral vector) use different platforms, positive results from any of them help validate the entire individualized neoantigen approach for investors and clinicians. The massive unmet medical need ensures the market is large enough to support multiple successful players.

Cellcuity is pursuing FDA approval first in a difficult-to-treat 'wild-type' breast cancer population. Data for the 'mutant' cohort is timed to support a supplemental filing post-approval, creating a strategic, sequential path to capture the entire market while getting to market faster.

Instead of competing with blockbuster PD-1 inhibitors like Keytruda, Multikine is positioned as a complementary therapy. It has shown efficacy in the majority of patients who lack the high PD-1 levels necessary for those inhibitors to work, creating a vast, underserved market.

In crowded fields like oncology, most companies flock to a few validated ideas, like kids chasing a soccer ball. Delpha Therapeutics' CEO Kevin Marks argues the real opportunity lies in pioneering novel biology in the wide-open parts of the field, creating a strategic advantage and potential scarcity effect.

In rare diseases, a previously approved drug with modest results can lower the efficacy benchmark for newcomers. Palvella Therapeutics' drug for a rare skin disease may only need ~30% efficacy for approval, as a competitor's drug (Hiftor) was approved with just a 23% patient responder rate, creating a low bar for a clinical win.