The wealth gap between asset owners and wage earners, once seen as a temporary economic trend, is solidifying into a permanent societal structure due to AI. This shift makes upward mobility nearly impossible for the 90% of people who do not own a diversified portfolio of assets.

The argument that AI will reduce inequality is flawed because democratizing access to tools doesn't democratize the economics. Technology markets naturally consolidate power and wealth, as seen with search engines and social networks. The financial benefits of AI are likely to concentrate at the top.

AI is driving a K-shaped economy. At the macro level, the AI sector booms while others decline. At the corporate level, AI stocks soar past others. At the individual level, a skills gap is widening between those who can leverage AI and those who can't.

AI is not a great equalizer; it's a productivity multiplier for those who are already highly skilled. A top-tier engineer or writer can double or triple their output, while an average performer sees smaller gains. This dynamic is set to exacerbate the K-shaped economy, making the rich richer and the poor comparatively poorer.

The primary cleavage in both Chinese and US online society is not political but based on wealth and agency. A deep pessimism exists among everyday users, who feel like "non-player characters" (NPCs) used by technology, contrasting sharply with the optimism of the tech elites building these systems.

A small cohort of advanced users is rapidly pushing the boundaries of AI, while most people and organizations remain unaware of its true capabilities. This growing chasm between the AI 'haves' and 'have-nots' will result in a severely skewed distribution of the technology's economic and productivity gains.

Unlike the industrial economy's bell-curve wealth distribution, the digital economy operates on a power law. A small percentage of participants capture a majority of the rewards, whether in e-commerce or online dating. This inherently shrinks the middle class.

The AI revolution will likely bifurcate the job market into a barbell shape. A 'productive class' will master AI and remain economically viable, while an 'unproductive or charity class' will be forced out of the system. This economic displacement will likely fuel anger, resentment, and social violence.

AI tools make highly productive individuals even more efficient, allowing them to expand their output significantly. Instead of hiring more people as their "business" grows, they will "hire" more AI agents, concentrating wealth and opportunity among existing successful players.