Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

During both the HIV/PrEP and Monkeypox outbreaks, public health activists actively discouraged reporting on behavioral changes and transmission patterns among gay men. This effort to avoid 'stigmatizing' a group led to misleading the general public and censoring journalists.

Related Insights

The CDC's claim that "anyone can get monkeypox" mirrored its earlier AIDS campaigns. While technically true, this messaging is profoundly misleading. It obscures the reality of transmission within high-risk groups, causing unnecessary panic for the general population and hindering targeted prevention.

The concept of "malinformation" reveals that governments aim to control not just lies, but also truths they deem too upsetting or disruptive for the public to know, creating a dangerous precedent for censorship.

Lying is an inherent function of all powerful institutions throughout history, not an exception. Meetings in government often focus on 'what' to tell the public, not 'how' to tell the truth. Examples like asbestos in baby powder and the dangers of opioids show a pattern of denial that can last for decades before the truth is admitted.

Former journalist Natalie Brunell reveals her investigative stories were sometimes killed to avoid upsetting influential people. This highlights a systemic bias that protects incumbents at the expense of public transparency, reinforcing the need for decentralized information sources.

Journalist Benjamin Ryan was explicitly told he would be fired from his job at an HIV magazine if he continued to antagonize activists, even in private Facebook discussions. This internal muzzling created a "fire in him" to never let it happen again, shaping his later contrarian reporting.

The modern form of government censorship has evolved beyond fighting disinformation (lies) to combating "malinformation." This is information that is factually true but deemed socially or politically inconvenient. This shift represents a move toward an Orwellian "ministry of truth" where inconvenient facts are suppressed.

The concept of "mal-information"—factually true information deemed harmful—is a tool for narrative control. It allows powerful groups to suppress uncomfortable truths by framing them as a threat, effectively making certain realities undiscussable even when they are verifiably true.

A dangerous form of government overreach is censoring "malinformation"—information that is factually true but is deemed harmful to a public policy objective, such as vaccine compliance. This practice prevents open discourse and society's ability to discover the actual truth, creating a path toward tyranny.

While successful in reducing smoking, the aggressive demonization of smoking in public health campaigns created a lasting stigma. As a result, lung cancer patients often face blame and receive less empathy compared to patients with other cancers like breast or colon cancer.

Anti-disinformation NGOs openly admit their definition of "disinformation" is not about falsehood. It includes factually true information that "promotes an adverse narrative." This Orwellian redefinition justifies censoring inconvenient truths to protect a preferred political outcome.

Public Health Activists Pressure Media to Hide 'Inconvenient Truths' About Disease Transmission | RiffOn