Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Instead of slow quarterly planning, Mustafa Suleiman's division uses rapid 6-8 week cycles, each ending with an in-person meetup for retrospectives and planning. This rhythm creates clear, falsifiable missions suitable for the fast-paced nature of AI development, keeping the entire organization synchronized and focused.

Related Insights

Unlike traditional software development, AI-native founders avoid long-term, deterministic roadmaps. They recognize that AI capabilities change so rapidly that the most effective strategy is to maximize what's possible *now* with fast iteration cycles, rather than planning for a speculative future.

Due to the rapid pace of AI-driven development, Ramp has abandoned annual or multi-year planning. They now operate on a three-month horizon, which is considered a long time because it allows them to accomplish what previously took three years, making long-term roadmaps obsolete.

In the fast-moving AI space, rigid long-term planning is futile. Lovable uses a flexible six-month product roadmap, while ElevenLabs uses quarterly initiatives for alignment but gives its foundational research teams total freedom from timelines to foster innovation.

In the fast-moving AI space, long-term roadmaps are obsolete. Anthropic uses lightweight monthly planning for execution and creates 3-6 month vision prototypes—not static decks—to provide directional alignment without creating a rigid plan that will quickly become outdated.

Jay Parikh, Microsoft's EVP of Core AI, champions a culture of 'more demos, less memos.' He argues that AI tools enable teams to produce 15 product iterations in 15 minutes, making showing a working demo far more effective and creative than writing a planning memo.

In the fast-moving AI sector, quarterly planning is obsolete. Leaders should adopt a weekly reassessment cadence and define "boundaries for experimentation" rather than rigid goals. This fosters unexpected discoveries that are essential for staying ahead of competitors who can leapfrog you in weeks.

With AI accelerating development from months to days, PMs must focus on unblocking engineers and launching weekly. This supersedes traditional emphasis on long-term, cross-team roadmap alignment, which was crucial when code was more expensive to produce.

In a rapidly evolving field like AI, long-term planning is futile as "what you knew three months ago isn't true right now." Maintain agility by focusing on short-term, customer-driven milestones and avoid roadmaps that extend beyond a single quarter.

The rapid pace of change in AI renders long-term strategic planning ineffective. With foundational technology shifts occurring quarterly, companies must adopt a fluid approach. Strategy should focus on core principles and institutional memory, while remaining flexible enough to integrate new tech and iterate on tactics constantly.

The team avoids traditional product roadmaps, which they find awkward and difficult. They focus on concrete 8-week sprints for immediate goals and a high-level "vibe" for their long-term vision. The medium-term is considered too unpredictable to plan effectively.

Microsoft AI Operates on 6-8 Week Cycles to Maintain Agility | RiffOn