Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Friedman expresses skepticism about the returns from trillions being invested directly into AI data centers. He sees a more attractive, lower-risk opportunity in the business services sector that supports this massive buildout—a classic 'picks and shovels' strategy for the modern AI gold rush.

Related Insights

A safer way to play the AI boom is to invest in companies selling the underlying compute infrastructure rather than the hyperscalers buying it. This strategy captures the upside of the secular trend while avoiding direct exposure to how the massive capital expenditure is funded, which may involve risky credit.

Amid uncertainty about which AI applications will win, Blackstone's strategy is to invest in the essential infrastructure all AI companies need. This "picks and shovels" approach targets data centers and electricity, guaranteeing exposure to the boom without betting on specific, high-risk application companies.

In the AI gold rush, don't bet on the "miners" like Google and Meta, who are spending billions on a new, high-risk game. Instead, invest in the "pickaxe makers"—the essential toll bridges like TSMC and ASML that every AI company must pass through, ensuring your investment has a higher probability of success.

Instead of betting on which AI models or applications will win, Karmel Capital focuses on the infrastructure layer (neocloud companies). This "pick and shovel" strategy provides exposure to the entire ecosystem's growth with lower valuations and less risk, as infrastructure is essential regardless of who wins at the top layers.

The biggest investment opportunity lies in the beneficiaries of big tech's massive AI capital expenditures. This "food chain" includes data centers, power grid upgrades, and industrial suppliers who are seeing unprecedented demand for the foundational infrastructure AI requires.

The AI investment case might be inverted. While tech firms spend trillions on infrastructure with uncertain returns, traditional sector companies (industrials, healthcare) can leverage powerful AI services for a fraction of the cost. They capture a massive 'value gap,' gaining productivity without the huge capital outlay.

Rather than picking a winning AI or crypto, the smarter investment is in the 'picks and shovels.' This means focusing on the infrastructure every autonomous agent will require to transact—such as wallets, custody services, and blockchain rails—regardless of which specific application succeeds.

The massive investment in AI seems disproportionate to the software market's size. However, its true potential is in automating and augmenting the services industry, which is 25 times larger than software, thus justifying the spend.

To capitalize on the AI boom while mitigating risk, investors should focus on 'enablers'—companies providing essential infrastructure like semiconductors, data centers, and cloud services. This 'picks and shovels' strategy avoids betting on specific application-level winners, which was a losing strategy for many dot-com investors.

Instead of competing in the crowded data center space, the firm invests in less obvious beneficiaries of the AI trend. This includes industrial real estate for advanced manufacturing and essential infrastructure like power and fiber that supports data centers, offering a better risk-adjusted entry point.