The vast majority of Americans are bewildered by Trump's Iran policy and do not support a military strike. This widespread confusion and lack of appetite for war give the president significant political cover to back down from his threats and pursue a diplomatic solution without facing major backlash.

The market's reaction to prolonged conflict can pressure political leaders to de-escalate. Citing past policy reversals after market dips, this 'Trump put' theory suggests financial markets can effectively force an end to military engagements when they become too costly for the economy.

The "TACO" acronym serves as a predictive model for Trump's foreign policy. It suggests a pattern of aggressive posturing and military action followed by a rapid search for a diplomatic "off-ramp" once resistance is met. Markets and adversaries can anticipate this behavior, expecting a short conflict despite initial escalation.

The public threats of a military strike against Iran may be a high-stakes negotiating tactic, consistent with Trump's style of creating chaos before seeking a deal. The goal is likely not war, which would be politically damaging, but to force Iran into economic concessions or a new agreement on US terms.

For decades, a tacit global agreement existed: the U.S. buys the world's goods and provides security, and in return, the world finances U.S. debt by buying Treasuries. As U.S. policy shifts towards protectionism and reduced global policing, other nations may no longer feel obligated to fund U.S. deficits, pushing borrowing costs higher.

The team's central economic forecast hinges on the belief that President Trump's sensitivity to falling stock prices and rising gas prices will compel him to de-escalate the conflict with Iran within weeks, preventing a recession.

The knee-jerk reaction to a geopolitical shock is often a bond market rally (flight to safety). However, if the shock impacts supply (e.g., oil), the market can quickly reverse. It pivots from pricing geopolitical risk to pricing the risk of persistent inflation, forcing yields higher in anticipation of rate hikes.

Contrary to decades of public statements prioritizing low gas prices, President Trump is prolonging the Iran conflict despite oil soaring over $100. The political cost of being perceived as weak and handing Iran a narrative victory outweighs the economic pain for him in this context.

Unlike historical precedents, the current geopolitical conflict has triggered a significant sell-off in US long bonds. This suggests a regime change where high sovereign debt and inflation fears mean bonds no longer serve their traditional flight-to-safety role.