The creation of talent agency CAA in 1975 by agents who defected from a larger firm mirrors the current AI landscape, where top researchers leave established labs like OpenAI to found competitors like Anthropic. This suggests that talent-driven industries consistently see cycles of unbundling led by key players.
Related Insights
The 2017 "Attention Is All You Need" paper, written by eight Google researchers, laid the groundwork for modern LLMs. In a striking example of the innovator's dilemma, every author left Google within a few years to start or join other AI companies, representing a massive failure to retain pivotal talent at a critical juncture.
The intense talent war in AI is hyper-concentrated. All major labs are competing for the same cohort of roughly 150-200 globally-known, elite researchers who are seen as capable of making fundamental breakthroughs, creating an extremely competitive and visible talent market.
The drama at Thinking Machines, where co-founders were fired and immediately rejoined OpenAI, shows the extreme volatility of AI startups. Top talent holds immense leverage, and personal disputes can quickly unravel a company as key players have guaranteed soft landings back at established labs, making retention incredibly difficult.
Top AI labs face a difficult talent problem: if they restrict employee equity liquidity, top talent leaves for higher salaries. If they provide too much liquidity, newly-wealthy researchers leave to found their own competing startups, creating a constant churn that seeds the ecosystem with new rivals.
Quora's initial engineering team was a legendary concentration of talent that later dispersed to found or lead major AI players, including Perplexity and Scale AI. This highlights how talent clusters from one generation of startups can become the founding diaspora for the next.
A significant number of leading AI companies, such as Anthropic and XAI, were founded by executives who left larger players like OpenAI out of disagreement or rivalry. This "spite" acts as a powerful motivator, driving the creation of formidable competitors and shaping the industry's landscape.
The 'Valinor' metaphor for AI talent's destination has flipped. It once signified leaving big labs for well-funded startups like Thinking Machines. Now, as those startups face turmoil, Valinor represents a return to the stability and immense resources of established players like OpenAI, which are re-attracting top researchers.
The frenzied competition for the few thousand elite AI scientists has created a culture of constant job-hopping for higher pay, akin to a sports transfer season. This instability is slowing down major scientific progress, as significant breakthroughs require dedicated teams working together for extended periods, a rarity in the current environment.
The "Valinor" metaphor for top AI talent has evolved. It once meant leaving big labs for lucrative startups. Now, as talent returns to incumbents like OpenAI with massive pay packages, "Valinor" represents the safety and resources of the established players.
Despite Meta offering nine-figure bonuses to retain top AI employees, its chief AI scientist is leaving to launch his own startup. This proves that in a hyper-competitive field like AI, the potential upside and autonomy of being a founder can be more compelling than even the most extravagant corporate retention packages.
