The Federal Reserve has lost control. Soaring national debt and its interest payments—the second-largest budget item—force policy decisions. This "fiscal dominance" is pushing the U.S. towards an inevitable sovereign debt crisis within a decade.

The Federal Reserve is paralyzed. Cutting interest rates to support the bond market would fuel accelerating inflation. Raising rates to fight inflation would make interest payments on the national debt unsustainable for the Treasury, creating a no-win scenario.

Rising long-term interest rates should not be viewed as a random market crisis to be solved, but as a direct and predictable consequence of unsustainable government spending. It is the market delivering an 'invoice' for fiscal irresponsibility. The solution is not to fight the rate, but to fix the underlying behavior.

Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.

The Federal Reserve faces "fiscal dominance," where government debt dictates monetary policy. With a massive amount of US debt maturing in 2026, the Fed will be forced to lower interest rates to make refinancing manageable, regardless of other economic indicators. The alternative is national insolvency.

In a world where the government is the largest debtor, raising interest rates acts as a fiscal transfer, increasing income for the private sector (bondholders). When this is financed through monetized bill issuance, higher rates can paradoxically become an economic stimulus, not a contractionary force.

The Fed's tool of raising interest rates is designed to slow bank lending. However, when inflation is driven by massive government deficits, this tool backfires. Higher rates increase the government's interest payments, forcing it to cover a larger deficit, which can lead to more money printing—the root cause of the inflation in the first place.

Under "fiscal dominance," the U.S. government's massive debt dictates Federal Reserve policy. The Fed must keep rates low enough for the government to afford interest payments, even if it fuels inflation. Monetary policy is no longer about managing the economy but about preventing a debt-driven collapse, making the Fed reactive, not proactive.

The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'