Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Measuring schools by absolute test scores rewards those that simply select the best students. Measuring by growth rate—the slope of the learning curve—reveals which schools are actually effective at developing students, regardless of their starting point.

Related Insights

Critics cite Stride's lower standardized test scores versus brick-and-mortar schools as a sign of failure. This is misleading, as Stride's students are often already underperforming or have disabilities and health issues. The correct metric is progress against their own baseline, not against the general school population.

Joe Liemandt reveals that students from elite private schools, despite having A's, are often years behind grade level when objectively assessed. This systemic grade inflation misleads parents and makes it nearly impossible for these institutions to adopt transparent AI tutors that would expose these deficiencies.

A key driver of Mississippi's praised reading scores was a policy preventing low-performing third graders from advancing. This effectively removed the bottom 10% from the fourth-grade test pool, artificially inflating the state's average scores and masking true progress.

In school, an 80% score is a "B," but in sports, a 20% failure rate on a basic skill is unacceptable. Alpha School applies a sports-like definition of mastery, where students must know concepts "cold" before advancing, preventing the compounding knowledge gaps that plague traditional education.

Schooling has become a victim of Goodhart's Law. When a measure (grades, test scores) becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. Students become experts at 'doing school' — maximizing the signal — which is a separate skill from the actual creative and intellectual capabilities the system is supposed to foster.

The most powerful selling point for an EdTech platform to school districts is not just student test prep. It's the aggregated data that provides administrators with a diagnostic tool, revealing underlying misconceptions and systemic gaps in their curriculum that need to be addressed.

AI makes cheating easier, undermining grades as a motivator. More importantly, it enables continuous, nuanced assessment that renders one-off standardized tests obsolete. This forces a necessary shift from a grade-driven to a learning-driven education system.

When education shifts from rote assignments to open-ended challenges, students from tougher circumstances often outperform their affluent peers. Well-off, micromanaged children can freeze when a clear rubric is absent, while others embrace ambiguity and rise to the challenge.

When complex entities like universities are judged by simplified rankings (e.g., U.S. News), they learn to manipulate the specific inputs to the ranking formula. This optimizes their score without necessarily making them better institutions, substituting genuine improvement for the appearance of it.

Performance isn't an opinion. To remove subjectivity, define top performers as those consistently in the top 10% of their peer group against a clear scoreboard. This focuses on current, measurable results rather than vague potential, making it obvious who is truly winning.