Relying solely on Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is insufficient for HER2 testing in biliary tract cancers. Data shows NGS misses up to 15% of patients with HER2 overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Performing both tests is essential to avoid denying patients effective targeted therapies.

Effective treatment of HER2-driven NSCLC requires more than just identifying mutations. HER2 is a multiplexed biomarker where both genetic mutations (TKD and non-TKD) and protein overexpression (via IHC) are independently actionable. Comprehensive testing is crucial to ensure patients are eligible for the full range of available targeted therapies, including TKIs and ADCs.

Standard Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) reports often just state "MET amplification" without a specific copy number. To make informed treatment decisions with MET inhibitors, clinicians must proactively contact the testing company's molecular pathology department to obtain this crucial, unlisted data point.

Oncologists distinguish between HER2 amplification (the target for ADCs like TDXD) and activating mutations. A patient whose tumor loses amplification but retains a mutation is considered "HER2 mutated," not "HER2 positive," and is generally not a candidate for ADC therapy.

For HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer, experts choose HER2-targeted therapies like TDXD or tucatinib/trastuzumab over standard second-line chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/BEV), despite label constraints. The rationale is the significantly higher response rate from targeting the oncogenic driver directly.

While re-biopsying at disease progression is the "by-the-book" standard to confirm biomarkers like HER2, clinicians acknowledge it is often skipped. The difficulty of obtaining tissue and the desire to provide patients with potential treatment options create a gap between guidelines and clinical reality.

In the rare scenario of colorectal cancer with both HER2 amplification and a KRAS G12C mutation, US-based experts might prioritize KRAS-directed therapy. This preference is driven by durable data for KRAS inhibitors, even though choosing between targets is difficult without direct comparative studies.

Patients with HER2-positive GI cancers can lose expression after treatment. While re-biopsy is ideal, it's often impractical or risky. In these cases, clinicians find ctDNA analysis of HER2 copy numbers to be a reliable alternative for guiding subsequent treatment decisions.

HER2 amplification is a primary resistance mechanism to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Therefore, oncologists should avoid using drugs like panitumumab or cetuximab in HER2-positive patients, even if they are RAS wild-type, as these patients experience rapid progression on such regimens.