When a colorectal tumor loses HER2 protein expression (IHC 0) but retains HER2 gene amplification via NGS, the decision to continue HER2-targeted therapy is guided by the amplification copy number. A low copy number argues against continuing the targeted regimen.
For RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, oncologists may prefer starting with a trastuzumab/tucatinib regimen over TDXD. This sequencing strategy preserves TDXD as a later option, as there is currently no data supporting tucatinib's efficacy after a patient has progressed on TDXD.
For HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer, experts choose HER2-targeted therapies like TDXD or tucatinib/trastuzumab over standard second-line chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/BEV), despite label constraints. The rationale is the significantly higher response rate from targeting the oncogenic driver directly.
In the rare scenario of colorectal cancer with both HER2 amplification and a KRAS G12C mutation, US-based experts might prioritize KRAS-directed therapy. This preference is driven by durable data for KRAS inhibitors, even though choosing between targets is difficult without direct comparative studies.