Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

A regional approach to EM local rates is ineffective. A better framework groups countries by their monetary policy drivers: 1) low-yielders hiking on strong fundamentals, 2) vulnerable countries defensively hiking who may now see relief, and 3) high-yielders with desynchronized cycles that benefit most from positive risk sentiment.

Related Insights

In a reversal of historical norms, emerging market policymakers have been more disciplined with monetary and fiscal policy. This has led to lower average inflation in EM countries, creating attractive opportunities with real yields that are significantly higher than in developed markets.

The Federal Reserve's decision to keep rates unchanged provides a crucial, if unintentional, benefit to Emerging Markets. It limits pressure on EM central banks that would otherwise be forced to hike rates to defend weakening currencies against a backdrop of rising global interest rates, giving them more time to assess the shock.

Emerging market monetary policy is diverging significantly. Markets now price in rate hikes for low-yielding countries like Colombia, Korea, and Czechia due to stalled disinflation. In contrast, high-yielding markets continue to offer attractive yield compression opportunities, representing the primary focus for investors in the space.

While a stronger growth environment supports EM currencies, it is problematic for low-yielding EM government bonds. Their valuations were based on aggressive local central bank easing cycles which now have less scope to continue, especially with a potentially shallower Fed cutting cycle, making them vulnerable to a correction.

Viewing the EM credit market in aggregate is misleading. While overall spreads are tighter year-to-date, this is driven almost entirely by Latin America's 50bps tightening. In contrast, regions closer to the conflict, like Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, have seen spreads widen, revealing a highly differentiated market reaction to recent shocks.

Recent increases in emerging market rates are accompanied by flattening or stable long-end yield curves. This suggests markets are pricing in central bank rate hikes to control inflation, rather than reacting to worsening fiscal concerns, which would typically cause the curve to steepen.

In emerging markets with high real yields (like EMEA and LATAM), central banks are responding to rapid currency appreciation by leaning towards monetary policy easing, such as rate cuts. This is seen as a more effective and tradable reaction than direct FX market intervention.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, a more dovish stance from an Emerging Market (EM) central bank might not cause sustained currency weakness. In a risk-on environment, lower policy rates can attract significant capital inflows into bonds. This demand for local assets can overwhelm the initial negative rate effect and ultimately strengthen the currency.

A significant shift is occurring where EM central banks, like in South Africa and Korea, are turning hawkish pre-emptively to combat inflation. This is happening even without the typical trigger of currency depreciation, indicating a proactive policy response to the inflation-growth mix rather than a reactive move to provide risk premia for a weakening currency.

In the current inflationary environment, a key differentiator for EM performance will be central bank behavior. Markets will favor "proactive" banks that hike early to anchor inflation expectations and engineer a soft landing, while the markets of "reactive" banks that fall behind the curve may underperform.