Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXD) and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) share the same cytotoxic payload, yet Dato-DXd has a much lower rate of interstitial lung disease (ILD). This indicates the toxicity is driven by the antibody-antigen interaction, not the payload itself.

Experts question the efficacy of sequencing ADCs like EV (Nectin-4 target) and DV (HER2 target) because they share the same MMAE chemo payload. Since resistance is often tied to the payload, not the target antibody, switching targets may not overcome resistance, though anecdotal responses have been observed.

The failure of the TROPiCS-04 trial for sacituzumab govitecan may not indicate the TROP2 ADC class is ineffective. Experts suggest problems with dosing and toxicity management (e.g., neutropenia) during the trial could be the real culprit, arguing that the drug class still holds promise.

Emerging data shows that a second ADC, particularly one with the same payload, often has limited efficacy. This suggests clinicians must be highly strategic in selecting the first ADC, as it may be their most impactful opportunity for this class of drugs.

Unlike older antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), newer agents are designed so their chemotherapy payload can diffuse out of the target cell and kill nearby tumor cells that may not even express the target antigen. This "bystander effect" significantly enhances their anti-tumor activity.

Contrary to concerns about cross-resistance between HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), retrospective data shows TDM-1 remains effective after progression on TDXD. This suggests the different cytotoxic payloads are key, allowing for effective sequencing and challenging the assumption that progression on one ADC class member precludes using another.

The differing efficacy and toxicity profiles of TROP2 ADCs like sacituzumab govitecan and Dato-DXD suggest that the drug's linker and payload metabolism are crucial determinants of clinical outcome. This indicates that focusing solely on the target antigen is an oversimplification of ADC design and performance.

Experts believe the stark difference in complete response rates (5% vs 30%) between two major ADC trials is likely due to "noise"—variations in patient populations (e.g., more upper tract disease) and stricter central review criteria, rather than a fundamental difference in the therapies' effectiveness.

Clinical trial data shows that despite specific toxicities, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can be better tolerated overall than standard chemotherapy. For example, trials for both sacituzumab govitecan and dato-DXd reported fewer patients discontinuing treatment in the ADC arm compared to the chemotherapy arm.