There's a growing recognition that the molecular profile of a primary tumor can differ significantly from its metastases. To guide treatment more accurately, the preferred practice is to biopsy an accessible metastatic lesion when possible, as this better reflects the biology of the active disease being treated.

An expert argues the path to curing metastatic cancer may mirror pediatric ALL's history: combining all highly active drugs upfront. Instead of sequencing treatments after failure, the focus should be on powerful initial regimens that eradicate cancer, even if it means higher initial toxicity.

With highly active agents yielding 30% complete response rates, the immediate goal should be to cure more patients by exploring potent combinations upfront. While sequencing minimizes toxicity, an ambitious combination strategy, such as ADC doublets, offers the best chance to eradicate disease and should be prioritized in clinical trials.

Cancer should be viewed not just as rogue cells, but as a complex system with its own supply chains and communication infrastructure. This perspective shift justifies novel therapies like Zelenorstat, which aim to dismantle this entire operating system by cutting its power source.

For patients with localized (non-metastatic) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal, adding systemic chemotherapy before standard chemoradiation does not improve outcomes. Randomized trial data has shown no positive impact from this neoadjuvant approach, reinforcing that concurrent chemoradiation remains the standard of care for curative intent in this setting.

A PD-L1 CPS score of zero should not automatically disqualify patients with metastatic anal cancer from receiving immunotherapy. The clinical distinction between a CPS of zero and one is marginal, and given the therapy's potential for benefit and low toxicity, clinicians should give patients the benefit of the doubt and offer the treatment.

Local recurrence of anal cancer in the pelvis post-chemoradiation is a major quality of life issue. These recurrences are often advanced, destructive, and difficult to resect or re-irradiate, leading to significant palliative problems such as severe pain, edema, and radiculopathy that are challenging to manage.

In late-stage metastatic colorectal cancer, the goal shifts from achieving significant tumor shrinkage to stabilizing the disease. This recalibration of 'success' focuses on maintaining quality of life and managing symptoms for patients who have undergone multiple prior therapies.

High relapse rates (~70%) in surgery-alone arms of recent trials suggest most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) already have micrometastatic disease. This reframes the disease, prioritizing early systemic therapy over immediate surgery to achieve control and potential cure.