Leading a smaller, cash-strapped company forces an executive to "turn over every stone" and understand the entire business. This hands-on, frugal mindset proves invaluable when later applied at the scale of a giant like Boehringer Ingelheim.
A mentor at Celgene advised that the best path to becoming its CFO was to leave and first become a public company CFO elsewhere. Large companies often prefer external candidates with proven executive track records for top roles, a credential that is difficult to gain by climbing the internal ladder.
Moving from a large corporation to a startup requires blending foundational knowledge of scaling processes with newfound resourcefulness and risk appetite. This transition builds a holistic business muscle, not just a product one, by forcing leaders to operate without endless resources or established brand trust.
The transition from a leadership role at a large pharma company like Gilead to a biotech CEO involves a massive shift in scope. Instead of managing one large function with a large team, a biotech CEO is hands-on with every aspect of the company, from science to finance.
The distinction between a 'big company' and 'small company' person is irrelevant. A founder's mindset—hustling to bring new ideas to life and driving outcomes—is equally applicable and valuable in a large corporation as it is in a startup.
While startups must be nimble, analytical processes from large corporations are invaluable. The key is applying the same rigorous thinking to decision-making but compressing the timeline. Having prior experience with similar situations allows leaders to make informed choices more quickly.
Ron Cooper credits his success not to being a "scaling guy" at Bristol-Myers Squibb, but the "fix-it guy." Being deployed to turn around struggling business units across different geographies and therapeutic areas provided the multicultural, problem-solving toolkit essential for navigating the constant challenges of leading a biotech startup.
The transition from a resource-rich environment like Novartis to an early-stage biotech reveals a stark contrast. The unlimited access to a global organization is replaced by a total reliance on a small, nimble team where everyone must be multi-skilled and hands-on, a change even experienced executives find jarring.
Luba Greenwood argues that unlike in tech, many biotech CEOs lack P&L experience. In today's cash-constrained market, CEOs need to be able to build financial models and understand finance deeply to be effective, a skill she personally developed after transitioning from law and science.
While success is celebrated publicly, some of the best leadership happens privately when a CEO makes the tough, candid call to shut down a program or company due to unfavorable data. This "truth-seeking" decision, often against their personal interest, is a hallmark of excellence.
Kenai CEO Nick Manusos attributes his startup success to his varied background at Abbott Labs, moving from manufacturing to sales to BD. This breadth prepared him to handle the multifaceted demands of a startup, where a leader must be a generalist who is comfortable with constant change.