A trial for a new Nectin-4 ADC was amended to include mandatory, prospective CYP2D6 genotyping after a few patients experienced life-threatening toxicities. This highlights the growing importance of pharmacogenomics for ensuring the safety of novel ADCs.

The discovery of low-grade, asymptomatic interstitial lung disease (ILD) on scans for patients on certain ADCs does not mandate permanent discontinuation. By holding the drug, initiating steroids, and involving pulmonology, the inflammation can resolve, often allowing the patient to safely resume a highly effective therapy.

With multiple ADCs available, an emerging sequencing strategy is to alternate between different mechanisms of action, such as following a microtubule toxin-based ADC with a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor payload. This approach aims to avoid compounding specific toxicities, like neuropathy, and potentially circumvent resistance, though it is a strategy born from logic rather than clinical trial data.

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a significant risk with TDXD. However, a history of a completely resolved grade 1 event does not automatically preclude a patient from receiving the drug again. Clinicians may consider a re-challenge, balancing the risk against the lack of other viable therapies.

While the feared side effect of severe lung inflammation (pneumonitis) did not increase, other immune-mediated adverse events did. This led to higher rates of treatment discontinuation in the experimental arm, potentially negating any benefits of the concurrent approach and contributing to the trial's failure.

Unlike some immunotherapy guidelines, experts recommend immediate steroid treatment for even Grade 1 (asymptomatic) ADC-induced pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease (ILD) found on scans. This aggressive, proactive approach is considered necessary due to the risk of rapid clinical deterioration, prioritizing safety and the ability to resume cancer therapy.

Emerging data shows that a second ADC, particularly one with the same payload, often has limited efficacy. This suggests clinicians must be highly strategic in selecting the first ADC, as it may be their most impactful opportunity for this class of drugs.

A key principle for clinicians is that an antibody-drug conjugate's adverse events are primarily dictated by its linker-payload (e.g., deruxtecan, vedotin), not its specific antibody target. This allows for anticipating toxicities like neuropathy or GI issues based on the payload class, creating a predictable framework for management across different ADCs.

Clinicians should avoid directly comparing the toxicity profiles of new ADCs, as the data often comes from different trial stages. A drug in a Phase 1 expansion cohort may appear more toxic than one with mature Phase 2 randomized data, making definitive safety assessments premature.