Currently, Apple receives billions from Google for search traffic. A host predicts this will reverse for LLM queries as inference costs drop and monetization through ads and commerce increases, making each query net profitable and Apple's user base a valuable asset for LLMs.
Related Insights
While competitors focus on subscription models for their AI tools, Google's primary strategy is to leverage its core advertising business. By integrating sponsored results into its AI-powered search summaries, Google is the first to turn on an ad-based revenue model for generative AI at scale, posing a significant threat to subscription-reliant players like OpenAI.
While other AI companies are hesitant, Google is expected to lead LLM ad integration. As a company built on ads, it is culturally positioned to implement monetization quickly and effectively, unlike competitors that may view ads as a necessary evil rather than a core competency.
Google's search business is incredibly profitable, generating ~$400 per user annually in the US through ads. AI models, which provide direct answers instead of links, break this value capture mechanism. Current alternatives, like subscriptions, cannot yet replicate the scale and profitability of search, posing a direct threat to Google's core business model.
Google can afford to offer its LLM for free, creating immense pricing pressure on competitors like OpenAI. This strategy aims to eliminate competition by making their business models unprofitable, securing a monopoly for Google before it begins to monetize.
By integrating Google's Gemini directly into Siri, Apple poses a significant threat to OpenAI. The move isn't primarily to sell more iPhones, but to commoditize the AI layer and siphon off daily queries from the ChatGPT app. This default, native integration could erode OpenAI's mobile user base without Apple needing to build its own model.
It's crucial to balance the hype around LLMs with data. While their usage is growing at an explosive 100% year-over-year rate, the total volume of LLM queries is still only about 1/15th the size of traditional Google Search. This highlights it as a rapidly emerging channel, but not yet a replacement for search.
Apple is avoiding massive capital expenditure on building its own LLMs. By partnering with a leader like Google for the underlying tech (e.g., Gemini for Siri), Apple can focus on its core strength: productizing and integrating technology into a superior user experience, which may be the more profitable long-term play.
In a major strategic move, Apple is white-labeling Google's Gemini model to power the upcoming, revamped Siri. Apple will pay Google for this underlying technology, a tacit admission that its in-house models are not yet competitive. This partnership aims to fix Siri's long-standing performance issues without publicly advertising its reliance on a competitor.
The long-term monetization model for consumer LLMs is unlikely to be paid subscriptions. Instead, the market will probably shift toward free, ad- and commerce-supported models. OpenAI's challenge is to build these complex new revenue streams before its current subscription growth inevitably slows.
Jim Cramer parallels AI companies needing Apple's user base with his experience paying AOL for distribution in the 90s. The entity controlling the audience holds ultimate power and can charge for access, regardless of who has the superior technology.