Major tech companies are investing in their own customers, creating a self-reinforcing loop of capital that inflates demand and valuations. This dangerous practice mirrors the vendor financing tactics of the dot-com era (e.g., Nortel), which led to a systemic collapse when external capital eventually dried up.

To combat accounting allegations from investors like Michael Burry, NVIDIA's investor relations team sent a private 7-page memo to Wall Street analysts. This direct refutation, explicitly stating "NVIDIA says it's not Enron," reveals a high level of concern over market narratives, even for a financially dominant company.

When market leader NVIDIA felt compelled to publicly tweet about its competitive strength against Google's TPUs, it was perceived as a sign of insecurity. Confident leaders typically let their earnings and products speak for themselves, making the defensive communication a worrying indicator of their internal sentiment.

Companies like NVIDIA invest billions in AI startups (e.g., OpenAI) with the understanding the money will be spent on their chips. This "round tripping" creates massive, artificial market cap growth but is incredibly fragile and reminiscent of the dot-com bubble's accounting tricks.

When asked about AI's potential dangers, NVIDIA's CEO consistently reacts with aggressive dismissal. This disproportionate emotional response suggests not just strategic evasion but a deep, personal fear or discomfort with the technology's implications, a stark contrast to his otherwise humble public persona.

Jensen Huang counters accusations of inflating revenue by investing in customers. He clarifies the investment in OpenAI is a separate, opportunistic financial bet, while chip sales are driven by market demand and funded independently by OpenAI's own capital raising—not by NVIDIA's investment.

Meta is using off-balance-sheet "special purpose vehicles" (SPVs) to finance its AI data centers. This financial engineering obscures the true scale of its capital commitments by keeping massive debt and assets off its main balance sheet, a tactic explicitly compared to the controversial methods used by Enron.

NVIDIA sent a private memo to Wall Street analysts refuting accounting criticisms. When the memo leaked, it created a negative public news cycle ('NVIDIA says it's not Enron'), forcing the company into a defensive position and amplifying the skepticism it was trying to discreetly manage.

Unlike sham transactions that invent revenue, investments like Nvidia's into its GPU customers are economically sound. The deciding factor is the massive, verifiable downstream demand for the AI tokens these GPUs produce. This makes the deals a form of strategic credit extension, not fraudulent accounting.