Managers work in small time blocks, so a meeting is just one of many. Makers require large, uninterrupted chunks. A single meeting breaks a large block into two unusable smaller ones, effectively destroying an entire half-day's worth of productive output for the maker.
Related Insights
Many professionals boast about working long hours, but this time is often filled with distractions and low-impact tasks. The focus should be on eliminating "whack hours"—unproductive time spent doom-scrolling or in pointless meetings—and working with deep focus when you're on the clock.
Instead of open-ended agenda items like "let's do intros," propose specific time frames, such as "Let me give you 90 seconds on me, you can give me 90 seconds on you." This small framing tactic establishes you as a professional who respects time, prevents conversations from meandering, and maintains control of the meeting's flow.
High-performing remote teams exhibit "bursty" collaboration—short, intense periods of interaction followed by deep work. To enable this, teams should cancel recurring meetings and instead establish shared "collaboration hours" where everyone is available for ad-hoc problem-solving and spontaneous discussion.
The first step to better meetings is asking "should we have this meeting at all?" By eliminating purely informational meetings, you prevent the formation of norms like disengagement and silence. This makes it more likely that when a collaborative meeting is necessary, team members will actively participate.
Calendly's research reveals a paradox: while the common sentiment is anti-meeting, a vast majority (81%) of professionals believe more productive meetings would help them at work. This suggests the problem isn't the quantity of meetings, but their quality and purpose. People crave effective, decision-oriented collaboration.
When a maker's performance drops, managers often increase check-in meetings to 'help'. These interruptions further fragment the maker's time, causing performance to drop even more. This creates a productivity death spiral where the manager's intended solution becomes the root cause of the problem.
Productive teams need to schedule three distinct types of time. Beyond solo deep work and structured meetings, they must carve out 'fluid collaboration' blocks. These are for unstructured, creative work like brainstorming or pair programming, which are distinct from formal, agenda-led meetings and crucial for innovation.
The Zeigarnik effect causes the brain to fixate on open loops, like a future meeting. For a maker, this scheduled task consumes mental bandwidth, disrupts immersion, and forces clock-watching, killing productivity hours before the meeting even begins. The cost is far greater than the meeting's duration.
When a necessary meeting breaks a maker's large time block, they shouldn't try to salvage the small surrounding chunks. Instead, they should treat the entire day as a 'manager day,' packing it with as many meetings and administrative tasks as possible to protect other days for uninterrupted deep work.