Roka News founders reflect that their biggest failures occurred when they tried to copy established media models. Their greatest successes, like their on-the-ground YouTube documentaries, came from executing on their unique, original instincts, even if it took years to realize them.
The most significant founder mistakes often arise from abandoning one's own judgment to do what is conventionally expected. Jason Fried notes that these errors feel worse because you aren't just failing, you're failing while trying to be someone else, which undermines the core identity of your company.
Roka News chose profitability over further VC funding, recognizing a fundamental misalignment. Even successful news media exits, like Morning Brew's $75M sale, are considered small outcomes for VCs. This pressure for unicorn-scale returns can corrupt a news organization's mission and independence.
Breakthrough companies often succeed not by iterating endlessly, but by 'planting a flag'—making a strong, often contrarian bet on a core thesis (e.g., email-first media) and relentlessly executing against that vision, even when it's unpopular or lacks momentum.
Founders with deep market fit must trust their unique intuition over persuasive, but generic, VC advice. Following the standard playbook leads to cookie-cutter companies, while leaning into the 'weird' things that make your business different is what creates a unique, defensible moat.
Roka News's founders built their initial media skills and network by taking over a neglected podcast at their think tank employer. This provided a low-risk environment to experiment and gain access to high-profile guests, which gave them the confidence to launch their own venture.
In school or corporate jobs, the 'rules for success' are provided. Founders enter a world with no such rubric and often fail because they don't consciously develop their own theory of how the world works, instead defaulting to shallow, unexamined beliefs about what founders 'should' do.
Success stories like Notion's cannot be replicated because they are a direct result of their founder's unique personality and 'narrative violations.' Great companies succeed based on the specific, unrepeatable idiosyncrasies of their founders. The key is to embrace these unique traits, not follow a generic playbook.
To identify non-consensus ideas, analyze the founder's motivation. A founder with a deep, personal reason for starting their company is more likely on a unique path. Conversely, founders who "whiteboarded" their way to an idea are often chasing mimetic, competitive trends.
Chomps' founders learned not to blindly copy the strategies of successful brands. They advise founders to gather wide-ranging feedback but to ultimately analyze it through their own company's unique context, as what works for one brand is not a guarantee of success for another.
Seeing an existing successful business is validation, not a deterrent. By copying their current model, you start where they are today, bypassing their years of risky experimentation and learning. The market is large enough for multiple winners.