Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To get a buyer to pay a premium, you must create the illusion or reality of a second bidder. A buyer's willingness to stretch on valuation is based almost entirely on their fear of losing the deal to a competitor. Your job as the seller is to manufacture that competitive tension.

Related Insights

Leaking a pending M&A deal is a direct negotiation tactic, not just a rumor. It forces other potential acquirers with the target on their list into an urgent 'deal mode.' This creates immediate pressure, forcing a rapid decision and potentially generating a competing paper offer within days, which gives the seller significant leverage.

To create urgency, Zayo's deal team would discuss a (sometimes fictional) competing deal that was picking up momentum. This tactic made the seller fear losing the buyer's attention, motivating them to close the current deal quickly.

In a competitive M&A process where the target is reluctant, a marginal price increase may not work. A winning strategy can be to 'overpay' significantly. This makes the offer financially indefensible for the board to reject and immediately ends the bidding process, guaranteeing the acquisition.

If a founder has to actively shop their company to potential acquirers, they will likely receive a low valuation. In contrast, truly great companies attract multiple inbound offers, allowing them to run a competitive bidding process and command a much higher price.

To justify a high acquisition multiple, a founder must prove the business can operate without them. A powerful tactic is showing an acquirer your calendar to demonstrate that a majority of key clients are managed by the team, not the founder. This de-risks the acquisition and proves the company has true enterprise value.

Once a company is in an auction, the valuation framework shifts from intrinsic value to behavioral economics. Bidders are often driven by ego, public commitment, and a refusal to lose. They are no longer buying just cash flows but "redemption for their ego," driving prices beyond rational models.

After skillfully negotiating two offers and nearly doubling the price for SiteAdvisor, Chris Dixon felt he had maximized the deal. However, the acquiring CEO later revealed his board had authorized a price twice as high, a humbling lesson that a seller rarely knows the buyer's true willingness to pay.

In high-stakes acquisitions, the emotional desire to "win" and achieve kingmaker status often overrides financial discipline. Acquirers, driven by ego, blow past their own price limits, leading to massive overpayment and a high likelihood of the merger failing to create shareholder value.

Stripe is considering acquiring OpenRouter for over 70 times its revenue, a multiple three times higher than the recent pricey Cursor deal. This inflated valuation suggests that fear of missing out (FOMO) and competitive bidding from other players are driving the price far beyond traditional fundamentals.

In a competitive M&A process, intentionally bidding below the banker's guidance can be a strategic move. If the firm is a credible buyer, the banker may call back to nudge the price up, revealing valuable information about the true clearing price and the competitive landscape without overbidding initially.