Applying the historical pattern, the current, all-consuming AI zeitgeist is imprinting on today's 20-year-olds (born in 2005). This theory predicts they will emerge as the dominant cluster of leaders in AI and AI-adjacent fields within the next two decades, around 2045.
Related Insights
The theory posits that age 20 is a unique sweet spot for ambition formation. Individuals are past high school and forming their identity but are not yet locked into major commitments like mortgages or families, making them highly susceptible to the dominant societal 'zeitgeist'.
The current AI market is like hot, moving fat in a skillet—fluid and competitive. The key strategic question is predicting when "the heat comes off and then everything's fixed." This "congealing" moment will lock in market leaders and make disruption much harder, marking the end of the wild early phase.
Unlike previous tech waves that trickled down from large institutions, AI adoption is inverted. Individuals are the fastest adopters, followed by small businesses, with large corporations and governments lagging. This reverses the traditional power dynamic of technology access and creates new market opportunities.
While AI-native, new graduates often lack the business experience and strategic context to effectively manage AI tools. Companies will instead prioritize senior leaders with high AI literacy who can achieve massive productivity gains, creating a challenging job market for recent graduates and a leaner organizational structure.
The intense talent war in AI is hyper-concentrated. All major labs are competing for the same cohort of roughly 150-200 globally-known, elite researchers who are seen as capable of making fundamental breakthroughs, creating an extremely competitive and visible talent market.
AI tools are so novel they neutralize the advantage of long-term experience. A junior designer who is curious and quick to adopt AI workflows can outperform a veteran who is slower to adapt, creating a major career reset based on agency, not tenure.
Quora's initial engineering team was a legendary concentration of talent that later dispersed to found or lead major AI players, including Perplexity and Scale AI. This highlights how talent clusters from one generation of startups can become the founding diaspora for the next.
Contrary to the focus on professional use cases, OpenAI's largest study shows that 46% of messages from adult consumer users are from the 18-25 age group. This indicates the emergence of an "AI native" generation whose approach to work and education will be fundamentally different.
Experience alone no longer determines engineering productivity. An engineer's value is now a function of their experience plus their fluency with AI tools. Experienced coders who haven't adapted are now less valuable than AI-native recent graduates, who are in high demand.
The AI startup scene is dominated by very young founders with no baggage and repeat entrepreneurs. Noticeably absent are mid-level managers from large tech companies, a previously common founder profile. This group appears hesitant, possibly because their established skills feel less relevant in the new AI paradigm.
