Despite personal losses and skepticism, Scott Galloway suggests allocating 1-3% of a portfolio to Bitcoin. The rationale isn't belief in crypto's mission, but its established role as a legitimate, highly volatile asset class that can provide non-correlated diversification.
Related Insights
As Bitcoin matures, its risk-return profile is changing. The era of doubling in value every couple of years may be over. Instead, it could transition into a high-performing asset that reliably generates 15-25% annualized returns, outperforming traditional assets but no longer offering the explosive, "get rich quick" upside of its early days.
Bitcoin's core properties (fixed supply, perfect portability) make it a superior safe haven to gold. However, the market currently treats it as a volatile, risk-on asset. This perception gap represents a unique, transitional moment in financial history.
As a highly volatile and retail-driven asset, Bitcoin serves as a leading indicator for investor risk appetite. It's a "canary in the coal mine" where a "risk on" sentiment leads to sharp increases, while a "risk off" mood triggers rapid declines, often preceding moves in traditional markets.
Bitcoin's 27% plunge, far exceeding the stock market's dip, shows how high-beta assets react disproportionately to macro uncertainty. When the central bank signals a slowdown due to a "foggy" outlook, investors flee to safety, punishing the riskiest assets the most.
When a small, speculative investment like crypto appreciates massively, it can unbalance an entire portfolio by becoming an oversized allocation. This 'good problem' forces investors to systematically sell the high-performing asset to manage risk, even as it continues to grow.
Solana's founder advocates holding Bitcoin not for growth—as it lacks cash flows—but as an insurance policy. It's a small (e.g., 2%) portfolio allocation that acts as a portable, censorship-resistant asset in a worst-case scenario of societal collapse.
The recent divergence, where Bitcoin has fallen significantly while major stock indices remain stable, breaks the asset's recent high correlation with risk-on equities. This suggests the current bearish sentiment is isolated to the crypto asset itself and its specific market dynamics, rather than being part of a broader market-wide downturn.
The acceptable crypto allocation for institutional investors has significantly increased, moving from a previously standard 1% to as high as 4%. This shift is driven by a fundamental change in perception: the binary 'go-to-zero' risk of crypto is no longer a primary concern for major allocators.
Client interest in Bitcoin isn't monolithic. It falls into three primary buckets: those seeking an inflation hedge like "digital gold," those treating it as a high-risk, high-reward tech investment like venture capital, and those using its low correlation for portfolio diversification.
As Bitcoin became integrated into the financial system, it lost its key characteristic as an asset uncorrelated with traditional markets. It now moves in tandem with high-risk investments like tech stocks, meaning negative sentiment in one market creates spillovers into the other. This undermines its original appeal as a portfolio diversifier.
