The critical flaw in most sales tech is its failure to correlate rep behavior with performance outcomes like quota attainment. The real value is unlocked not just by knowing what reps do, but by connecting those actions to who is succeeding, thus identifying true winning behaviors and separating A-players from C-players.

Vague "closed-lost" reasons like 'budget' or 'timing' often lead to sales blaming marketing. A "close loss audit" filters CRM data for these reasons to quantify revenue lost to the status quo, creating a shared enemy for both teams to rally against instead of fighting each other.

The fundamental tension between sales and marketing extends beyond KPIs to their core operational perspectives. Marketing operates at a macro level, analyzing broad market trends and brand awareness. In contrast, sales is hyper-focused on the micro level of one-on-one customer interactions. This inherent difference in viewpoint is a primary source of friction.

Limiting marketers' visibility after a lead is passed to sales is 'unconscionable.' Full CRM access allows them to see deal progression, read sales notes, and understand win/loss reasons, providing crucial feedback to align messaging from the first ad to the final close.

A CRM is more than a database; it's the engine for accountability and strategy. Without the ability to track revenue drivers, customer segments, and marketing ROI, you cannot make data-informed decisions or manage performance. This foundational gap kills your potential for strategic growth.

CMO Ben Schechter argues that tracking raw lead count is a dangerous metric. A marketing leader can easily manipulate lead scoring to hit a volume target, flooding sales with low-quality prospects. This erodes sales team trust and causes them to stop following up on all marketing-generated leads.

A modern data model revealed marketing influenced over 90% of closed-won revenue, a fact completely obscured by a last-touch attribution system that overwhelmingly credited sales AEs. This shows the 'credit battle' is often a symptom of broken measurement, not just misaligned teams.

Sales leadership has established weekly, monthly, and quarterly cadences for pipeline reviews and forecasting. Marketing often lacks this structured, repeatable process for tracking its own leading and lagging indicators. Adopting a similar operational rhythm would significantly boost marketing's credibility with the C-suite and board.

Instead of debating multi-touch attribution, first identify the single, independent event that caused a sales rep to engage a prospect. This "trigger" (e.g., demo request, MQL score) reveals the true efficiency of your GTM motions, which is a more fundamental problem to solve.