While there is majority public support for banning teen social media use in the U.S., regulation is blocked by 'whataboutism'—a lobbying tactic of raising endless hypothetical objections (e.g., VPNs, privacy) to create legislative paralysis and prevent any action from being taken.

The problem with social media isn't free speech itself, but algorithms that elevate misinformation for engagement. A targeted solution is to remove Section 230 liability protection *only* for content that platforms algorithmically boost, holding them accountable for their editorial choices without engaging in broad censorship.

Pinterest's CEO argues that social media should establish common safety standards, akin to crash test ratings. This would allow companies to differentiate themselves and build brands around user well-being, turning a regulatory burden into a proactive, market-driven competitive advantage.

Relying solely on parents to manage kids' social media use is flawed. When a single child is taken off platforms like Snapchat, they aren't protected; they're ostracized from their peer group. This network effect means only collective action through legislation can effectively address the youth mental health crisis.

Despite its stock dropping 20% after making under-16 accounts private-by-default, Pinterest's young user base nearly doubled a year later. The move resonated with Gen Z's desire for safer, less performative online spaces, turning a perceived business risk into a major growth driver and competitive advantage.

Contrary to the focus on professional use cases, OpenAI's largest study shows that 46% of messages from adult consumer users are from the 18-25 age group. This indicates the emergence of an "AI native" generation whose approach to work and education will be fundamentally different.

Facebook's main 'Blue' app is an underpriced attention channel. Contrary to popular belief, usage among 22-32 year olds is surprisingly high due to features like Marketplace and Groups, but it's often unacknowledged. This creates a significant arbitrage opportunity for marketers who can reach this demographic at a lower cost than on more saturated platforms.

The speaker stopped sharing her children's faces online after an incident where a fan's familiarity confused her daughter. This moment crystallized the understanding that children cannot consent to the parasocial relationships and lack of privacy that come with being a creator's child.

Entrepreneurs often see the kids' market as less crowded and thus easier to enter. The reality is the opposite: it's less crowded because it's significantly more complex, with far more laws and regulations (like COPPA) that founders must navigate successfully to survive.