Investors fleeing to hard assets like energy for safety from AI are ignoring second-order effects. AI's problem-solving capabilities could lead to breakthroughs, such as in battery technology, which would disrupt the very "safe" assets investors are buying by making renewables more viable.
History shows that transformative technologies like railroads and the internet often create market bubbles. Investors can lose tremendous amounts of capital on overpriced assets, even while the technology itself fundamentally rewires the economy and creates massive societal value. The two outcomes are not mutually exclusive.
AI's ability to generate software at near-zero marginal cost is erasing the scarcity premium that propelled software stocks for over a decade. This realization is causing a massive capital rotation out of software ETFs and into tangible, scarce assets like metals and commodities.
Significant disruption often comes from applying mature technologies in novel contexts, not just from new inventions. Gaonkar points to 1970s lithium-ion batteries revolutionizing EVs and old gaming GPUs now powering the AI boom as prime examples of this powerful investment thesis.
Infrastructure investing, once seen as stable (e.g., toll roads), is now linked to the fast-paced tech sector via AI's needs. This introduces a new risk: rapid technological upgrades can devalue physical assets like cooling systems overnight, creating tech-like volatility.
The 50-year supremacy of asset-light software may be an anomaly. If AI makes software creation nearly free, economic value will shift back to the historical mean: tangible assets like infrastructure, energy, and regulated, liability-bearing businesses that touch the physical world.
The current AI investment boom is focused on massive infrastructure build-outs. A counterintuitive threat to this trade is not that AI fails, but that it becomes more compute-efficient. This would reduce infrastructure demand, deflating the hardware bubble even as AI proves economically valuable.
Most of the world's energy capacity build-out over the next decade was planned using old models, completely omitting the exponential power demands of AI. This creates a looming, unpriced-in bottleneck for AI infrastructure development that will require significant new investment and planning.
While power supply is a current data center bottleneck, a more significant long-term risk is technological disruption. Chip innovations promising 10-1000x more power efficiency could make today's massive, power-centric data center investments obsolete or oversized before they are fully utilized.
As AI gets exponentially smarter, it will solve major problems in power, chip efficiency, and labor, driving down costs across the economy. This extreme efficiency creates a powerful deflationary force, which is a greater long-term macroeconomic risk than the current AI investment bubble popping.
As AI agents become primary drivers of value creation, the ability to command computation will define wealth. Stored energy, convertible into computation, will be the ultimate resource. This makes finite, sovereign digital energy proxies like Bitcoin increasingly relevant as a foundational asset.