OpenAI's series of hundred-billion-dollar deals has propped up the market caps of its numerous infrastructure partners. This creates a systemic risk, as these partners are making huge capital expenditures based on OpenAI's revenue projections. A failure by OpenAI to pay could trigger a cascade of financial problems across the tech sector.

By structuring massive, multi-billion dollar deals, OpenAI is deliberately entangling partners like NVIDIA and Oracle in its ecosystem. Their revenue and stock prices become directly tied to OpenAI's continued spending, creating a powerful coalition with a vested interest in ensuring OpenAI's survival and growth, effectively making it too interconnected to fail.

Instead of bearing the full cost and risk of building new AI data centers, large cloud providers like Microsoft use CoreWeave for 'overflow' compute. This allows them to meet surges in customer demand without committing capital to assets that depreciate quickly and may become competitors' infrastructure in the long run.

The AI ecosystem appears to have circular cash flows. For example, Microsoft invests billions in OpenAI, which then uses that money to pay Microsoft for compute services. This creates revenue for Microsoft while funding OpenAI, but it raises investor concerns about how much organic, external demand truly exists for these costly services.

OpenAI's aggressive partnerships for compute are designed to achieve "escape velocity." By locking up supply and talent, they are creating a capital barrier so high (~$150B in CapEx by 2030) that it becomes nearly impossible for any entity besides the largest hyperscalers to compete at scale.

OpenAI is actively diversifying its partners across the supply chain—multiple cloud providers (Microsoft, Oracle), GPU designers (Nvidia, AMD), and foundries. This classic "commoditize your compliments" strategy prevents any single supplier from gaining excessive leverage or capturing all the profit margin.

The massive OpenAI-Oracle compute deal illustrates a novel form of financial engineering. The deal inflates Oracle's stock, enriching its chairman, who can then reinvest in OpenAI's next funding round. This creates a self-reinforcing loop that essentially manufactures capital to fund the immense infrastructure required for AGI development.

A theory suggests Sam Altman's massive, multi-trillion dollar spending commitments are a strategic play to incentivize a massive overbuild of AI infrastructure. By driving supply far beyond current demand, OpenAI could create a 'glut,' crashing the price of compute and securing a long-term strategic advantage as the primary consumer.

A theory suggests Sam Altman's $1.4T in spending commitments may be a strategic move to trigger a massive overbuild of AI infrastructure. This would create a future "compute glut," driving down prices and ultimately benefiting OpenAI as a primary consumer of that capacity.