Blippar's sophisticated image recognition was 'too clever' for mass adoption. The 'ugly as sin' but visually obvious QR code ultimately won because its function was immediately clear to users. This proves that intuitive, simple design is more critical for user behavior change than technological superiority.

Societies at their peak build large-scale public art to capture their values and ambition, a practice largely dormant in the U.S. since Mount Rushmore. Reviving this tradition, perhaps with modern materials like carbon fiber, can inspire progress and create lasting cultural symbols for the next generation.

Intel's team viewed their first microprocessor as an incremental improvement for building calculators, not a world-changing invention. The true revolution was sparked by outsiders who applied the technology in unforeseen ways, like building the first personal computers. This highlights that creators often cannot predict the true impact of their inventions.

The moving walkway’s popular debut at World's Fairs typecast it as an amusement ride, creating a "magnificently impractical" reputation that prevented government officials from taking it seriously for major urban infrastructure projects like the Brooklyn Bridge.

Instead of defaulting to skepticism and looking for reasons why something won't work, the most productive starting point is to imagine how big and impactful a new idea could become. After exploring the optimistic case, you can then systematically address and mitigate the risks.

New technologies perceived as job-destroying, like AI, face significant public and regulatory risk. A powerful defense is to make the general public owners of the technology. When people have a financial stake in a technology's success, they are far more likely to defend it than fight against it.

Like railroads, AI promises immense progress but also concentrates power, creating public fear of being controlled by a new monopoly. The populist uprisings by farmers against railroad companies in the 1880s offer a historical playbook for how a widespread, grassroots political movement against Big Tech could form.

Initial public fear over new technologies like AI therapy, while seemingly negative, is actually productive. It creates the social and political pressure needed to establish essential safety guardrails and regulations, ultimately leading to safer long-term adoption.

Wikipedia was initially dismissed by academia as unreliable. Over 15 years, its decentralized, community-driven model built immense trust, making it a universally accepted source of truth. This journey from skepticism to indispensability may serve as a blueprint for how society ultimately embraces and integrates artificial intelligence.