Billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg legally pay near-zero income tax by taking a $1 salary. Their wealth comes from stock appreciation. They access cash not by selling stock (a taxable event), but by borrowing against it. The core strategy is avoiding taxable income altogether.
Related Insights
The wealthy build wealth by buying assets, borrowing against them tax-free for living expenses, and then passing the assets to heirs with a "stepped-up basis" upon death. This maneuver effectively eliminates capital gains taxes for the next generation.
Congressman Ro Khanna proposes a tax on the total net worth of individuals with over $100 million. Unlike an income or capital gains tax, this targets unrealized wealth, forcing the liquidation of assets like stocks to generate the cash needed to pay the tax.
For high earners, strategic tax mitigation is a primary wealth-building tool, not just a way to save money. The capital saved from taxes represents a guaranteed, passive investment return. This reframes tax planning from a compliance chore to a core financial growth strategy.
The wealthiest individuals don't have traditional paychecks. Instead, they hold appreciating assets like stock and take out loans against that wealth to fund their lifestyles. This avoids triggering capital gains or income taxes, a key reason proponents are pushing for a direct wealth tax in California to address this loophole.
Instead of selling assets and triggering capital gains, the wealthy buy and hold assets like stocks. They then borrow against that portfolio tax-free for living expenses. When they die, a life insurance policy pays off the loan, allowing the original assets to pass to heirs tax-free.
Collectors buy art, have it appraised at a much higher value, and then borrow against that new value. Since loans are not considered income, this provides them with millions in tax-free cash for other investments, all without selling the underlying asset.
Instead of taxing unrealized gains, which forces asset sales and creates economic distortions, a more sensible approach is to tax the cash that wealthy individuals borrow against their assets. This targets actual liquidity and avoids punishing the long-term investment that builds the economy.
Billionaire wealth taxes are easily dodged by relocating. A more robust policy would tax capital gains based on the jurisdiction where the value was created, preventing billionaires from moving to a zero-tax state just before selling stock to avoid taxes.
The US tax system disproportionately penalizes high-income 'workhorses' (e.g., doctors, lawyers) who earn from labor. In contrast, the super-rich, who derive wealth from capital gains and have mobility, benefit from loopholes that result in dramatically lower effective tax rates.
A major flaw in the unrealized gains tax is that it punishes all investors for the actions of a few. A more targeted and less destructive approach would be to tax the loans that wealthy individuals take out against their stock portfolios, targeting the actual cash they use without harming the underlying assets.
