Collectors buy art, have it appraised at a much higher value, and then borrow against that new value. Since loans are not considered income, this provides them with millions in tax-free cash for other investments, all without selling the underlying asset.
Related Insights
The primary driver of wealth inequality isn't income, but asset ownership. Government money printing to cover deficit spending inflates asset prices. This forces those who understand finance to buy assets, which then appreciate, widening the gap between them and those who don't own assets.
The wealthy build wealth by buying assets, borrowing against them tax-free for living expenses, and then passing the assets to heirs with a "stepped-up basis" upon death. This maneuver effectively eliminates capital gains taxes for the next generation.
The 'bezel' is the inventory of hidden, fraudulent wealth that builds up during good economic times. Investor overconfidence, plentiful capital, and lax due diligence create the perfect environment for financial scams to flourish, with this phantom wealth only being discovered during a downturn.
By purchasing art, getting it appraised for a significantly higher value, and then donating it, collectors can claim a tax deduction for the full inflated amount. This deduction can exceed their original purchase price, effectively creating a net financial gain from a charitable act.
Unlike regulated stock exchanges, the art world lacks a central pricing authority. A small group of wealthy insiders can coordinate purchases of an artist's work at inflated prices, which legally and artificially creates a new, higher "market value" for their own holdings.
The wealthiest individuals don't have traditional paychecks. Instead, they hold appreciating assets like stock and take out loans against that wealth to fund their lifestyles. This avoids triggering capital gains or income taxes, a key reason proponents are pushing for a direct wealth tax in California to address this loophole.
High-profile sports franchises defy standard financial analysis. Their valuation is driven more by their scarcity and desirability as a "trophy asset," similar to a masterpiece painting. This makes them a store of value where the underlying business fundamentals are only part of the equation.
Instead of selling assets and triggering capital gains, the wealthy buy and hold assets like stocks. They then borrow against that portfolio tax-free for living expenses. When they die, a life insurance policy pays off the loan, allowing the original assets to pass to heirs tax-free.
The ultra-wealthy store art in "free ports"—private, tax-free warehouses. Because the art is legally considered "in transit," it remains untouched by domestic tax authorities, allowing for sales and storage without incurring customs duties or capital gains taxes.
Instead of taxing unrealized gains, which forces asset sales and creates economic distortions, a more sensible approach is to tax the cash that wealthy individuals borrow against their assets. This targets actual liquidity and avoids punishing the long-term investment that builds the economy.
