Tech giants like Google and Microsoft are spending billions on AI not just for ROI, but because failing to do so means being locked out of future leadership. The motivation is to maintain their 'Mag 7' status, which is an existential necessity rather than a purely economic calculation.

The AI race has been a prisoner's dilemma where companies spend massively, fearing competitors will pull ahead. As the cost of next-gen systems like Blackwell and Rubin becomes astronomical, the sheer economics will force a shift. Decision-making will be dominated by ROI calculations rather than the existential dread of slowing down.

Companies feel immense pressure to integrate AI to stay competitive, leading to massive spending. However, this rush means they lack the infrastructure to measure ROI, creating a paradox of anxious investment without clear proof of value.

Major tech companies are locked in a massive spending war on AI infrastructure and talent. This isn't because they know how they'll achieve ROI; it's because they know the surest way to lose is to stop spending and fall behind their competitors.

The world's most profitable companies view AI as the most critical technology of the next decade. This strategic belief fuels their willingness to sustain massive investments and stick with them, even when the ultimate return on that spending is highly uncertain. This conviction provides a durable floor for the AI capital expenditure cycle.

Previous technology shifts like mobile or client-server were often pushed by technologists onto a hesitant market. In contrast, the current AI trend is being pulled by customers who are actively demanding AI features in their products, creating unprecedented pressure on companies to integrate them quickly.

The initial enterprise AI wave of scattered, small-scale proofs-of-concept is over. Companies are now consolidating efforts around a few high-conviction use cases and deploying them at massive scale across tens of thousands of employees, moving from exploration to production.

Major tech companies view the AI race as a life-or-death struggle. This 'existential crisis' mindset explains their willingness to spend astronomical sums on infrastructure, prioritizing survival over short-term profitability. Their spending is a defensive moat-building exercise, not just a rational pursuit of new revenue.

Enterprise surveys show a major shift: CEOs are taking direct control of AI initiatives from CIOs. They are increasingly willing to make substantial, long-term investments in AI—even if a recession hits or if tangible ROI isn't immediately measurable—viewing it as an existential imperative for survival and growth.