While a common stock yielding near 10% often signals a "yield trap," a preferred stock yielding 7-9% is not a sign of distress. Its senior position in the capital structure (paid before common) justifies the higher, more debt-like yield that is typical for the asset class.
Related Insights
The primary threat to the high-yield market isn't a wave of corporate defaults, but rather a reversion of the compressed risk premium that investors demand. This premium has been historically low, and a return to normal levels presents a significant valuation risk, even if fundamentals remain stable.
Contrary to the belief that hot credit markets encourage high leverage, data shows high-yield borrowers currently have leverage levels around four times, the lowest in two decades. This statistical reality contrasts sharply with gloomy market sentiment driven by anecdotal defaults, suggesting underlying strength in the asset class.
Instead of simply holding Bitcoin, MicroStrategy layered on complex debt instruments like preferred stock. This convolution made it difficult for investors to understand the true risk and preference stack, contributing to the stock trading at a discount to its own assets when sentiment turned. Simplicity is safer.
The CCC-rated segment of the high-yield market should not be treated as a simple down-in-quality allocation. Instead, it's a "stock picker's" environment where opportunities are found in specific, idiosyncratic situations with high conviction, such as a turnaround story or a mispriced part of a company's capital structure.
Counterintuitively, high-yield corporate bonds are expected to perform better than investment-grade credit. They do not face the same supply headwind from AI-related debt issuance, and their fundamentals are supported by credit team forecasts of declining default rates over the next 12 months.
The modern high-yield market is structurally different from its past. It's now composed of higher-quality issuers and has a shorter duration profile. While this limits potential upside returns compared to historical cycles, it also provides a cushion, capping the potential downside risk for investors.
A significant shift in corporate finance strategy has occurred: companies no longer universally strive for an investment-grade (IG) rating. Many firms, including 'fallen angels' downgraded from IG, are content to operate with a high-yield rating, finding the higher borrowing costs acceptable for their business models.
Despite higher spreads in the loan market, high-yield bonds are currently seen as a more stable investment. Leveraged loans face risks from LME activity, higher defaults, and investor outflows as the Fed cuts rates (reducing their floating-rate appeal). Fixed-rate high-yield bonds are more insulated from these specific pressures.
Rising default rates in European high-yield are not translating to proportionally higher losses. This is because modern capital structures are dominated by secured debt, leading to exceptionally high recovery rates (70% vs. a historical 40% average), which cushions the overall impact on investors.
The gap between high-yield and investment-grade credit is shrinking. The average high-yield rating is now BB, while investment-grade is BBB—the closest they've ever been. This fundamental convergence in quality helps explain why the yield spread between the two asset classes is also at a historical low, reflecting market efficiency rather than just irrational exuberance.