Unlike launching new hardware (an additive choice), forcibly retiring a beloved software version like GPT-4.0 is a "negative launch." It takes something valuable away from loyal users, guaranteeing backlash. This requires a fundamentally different communication and rollout strategy compared to a typical product release.
The Browser Company's pivot required spending the "trust points" they'd built with their team and community. Leaders must be prepared for this painful drawdown and the internal/external backlash, even when they have high conviction in the new direction. It's a necessary but difficult part of a major strategic shift.
A dual-track launch strategy is most effective. Ship small, useful improvements on a weekly cadence to demonstrate momentum and reliability. For major, innovative features that represent a step-change, consolidate them into a single, high-impact 'noisy' launch to capture maximum attention.
OpenAI's attempt to sunset GPT-4.0 faced significant pushback not just from power users, but from those using it for companionship. This revealed that deprecating AI models isn't a simple version update; it can feel like 'killing a friend' to a niche but vocal user base, forcing companies to reconsider their product lifecycle strategy for models with emergent personalities.
Unlike traditional APIs, LLMs are hard to abstract away. Users develop a preference for a specific model's 'personality' and performance (e.g., GPT-4 vs. 3.5), making it difficult for applications to swap out the underlying model without user notice and pushback.
Unlike hardware launches where users can keep their old device, forced software updates like OpenAI's GPT-4o replacing 4.0 take something away from users. This sunsetting aspect creates a sense of loss and resentment, especially for users who have formed a deep attachment to the previous version, violating typical launch expectations.
After facing backlash for over-promising on past releases, OpenAI has adopted a "low ball" communication strategy. The company intentionally underplayed the GPT-5.1 update to avoid being "crushed" by criticism when perceived improvements don't match the hype, letting positive user discoveries drive the narrative instead.
OpenAI's rapid reversal on sunsetting GPT-4.0 shows a vocal minority—users treating the AI as a companion—can impact a major company's product strategy. The threat of churn from this high-value, emotionally invested group proved more powerful than the desire to streamline the product.
Contrary to the classic engineering rule to "never rewrite," Block's CTO believes AI will make this the new standard. He is pushing his teams to imagine a world where for every release, they delete the entire app (`rm -rf`) and rebuild it from scratch, with AI respecting all incremental improvements from the previous version.
In 2013, Google rolled out its significant 'Hummingbird' search algorithm update a full month before announcing it. No users complained because the experience simply improved. This 'ship then tell' strategy is a powerful playbook for consumer-facing AI products, proving an update's value through tangible benefits before users can form negative opinions based on an announcement.
Because AI products improve so rapidly, it's crucial to proactively bring lapsed users back. A user who tried the product a year ago has no idea how much better it is today. Marketing pushes around major version launches (e.g., v3.0) can create a step-change in weekly active users.