We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
After the GFC, the firm shifted its real estate funds from individual or regional incentives to a pooled structure. This fundamental change forced teams to think holistically about the entire portfolio's success, breaking down regional biases and improving collective decision-making.
To ensure capital flows to the best opportunities globally, General Atlantic uses a pooled economics model. A partner's compensation is based on the firm's overall performance, eliminating incentives to favor investments in their own region if better options exist elsewhere.
Drawing on Charlie Munger's wisdom, investment management problems often stem from misaligned incentives. Instead of trying to change people's actions directly, leaders should redesign the incentive structure. Rational individuals will naturally align their behavior with well-constructed incentives that drive desired client outcomes.
A key enabler for CalPERS' shift to a Total Portfolio Approach (TPA) was a pre-existing change in compensation. By rewarding all investment staff based on the entire fund's performance, not their specific asset class, the organization had already fostered the necessary collaborative mindset for TPA to work effectively.
To ensure genuine collaboration across funds, Centerbridge structures compensation so a "substantial minority" of an individual's pay comes from other areas of the firm. This economic incentive forces a firm-wide perspective and makes being "part of one team" a financial reality, not just a cultural slogan.
The pandemic prompted Blackstone's credit arm to shift from siloed business units to a unified structure. They created a horizontal CIO office to connect teams, standardize underwriting, and ensure insights from one area (e.g., private equity) inform decisions in another, creating a more resilient system.
By decoupling bonuses from AUM, the firm removes the incentive for managers to hoard assets for personal gain. This allows leadership to allocate capital optimally across managers based on style and portfolio needs, promoting a culture focused purely on performance.
Structuring compensation around a single, firm-wide P&L, rather than individual deal performance, eliminates internal competition. It forces a culture of true collaboration, as everyone's success is tied together. The system is maintained as a meritocracy by removing underperformers from the 'boat.'
To avoid losing its "partnership culture" after going public, Goldman Sachs deliberately maintained key mechanisms like partner elections and compensation tied heavily to overall firm performance, not just individual silos. This fostered a sense of collective ownership and long-term commitment.
To ensure long-term thinking, Hillpointe's development teams are primarily incentivized with a share of the fund's overall profit. This structure discourages pushing through bad deals just to earn a closing bonus, aligning the acquisition team's interests with the long-term success of the investment.
Separating investment teams by stage (seed, growth, public) creates misaligned incentives and arbitrary knowledge silos. A unified, multi-stage team can focus only on the handful of companies that truly matter, follow them across their entire lifecycle, and "never miss" an opportunity, even if the entry point changes.