Unlike other major illnesses with established protocols, there is no agreed-upon standard of care for eating disorders. The field is largely for-profit and unregulated, forcing patients to vet treatments and often pay out-of-pocket for evidence-based therapies.
Contrary to the belief that introverts must conserve social energy, studies show that when they act more extroverted—initiating conversations and forcing interaction—they become measurably happier without depleting their willpower. This challenges typical assumptions about introversion and well-being.
Contrary to their widespread use, both over-the-counter and prescription sleeping pills are deemed ineffective at best and harmful at worst by leading institutions like the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the Cleveland Clinic. They do not provide quality sleep and should be avoided.
Many popular wellness practices are rebranded versions of traditionally harmful eating behaviors. For example, 'intermittent fasting' is what used to be called skipping meals or starving, and a 'cheat day' is simply a binge. This reframing normalizes disordered eating patterns under the guise of health.
Humans have an 'additive bias,' preferring to add new things (like supplements or fads) rather than subtract harmful ones. For wellness, the most impactful and easiest changes involve avoiding obvious, high-impact risks before chasing marginal gains from the latest trends.
There is a plateau effect for exercise benefits. After 2.5 to 5 hours of vigorous activity per week, more exercise does not increase lifespan. This time could be better used for other meaningful activities like volunteering or socializing, which also contribute to well-being.